Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,904 Year: 4,161/9,624 Month: 1,032/974 Week: 359/286 Day: 2/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Psychology Behind the Belief in Heaven and Hell
Phat
Member
Posts: 18349
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 67 of 410 (531647)
10-19-2009 8:44 AM
Reply to: Message 11 by DevilsAdvocate
10-16-2009 7:05 PM


Re: Hell is Overkill
DevilsAdvocate writes:
I am not sure if this topic has been discussed yet or not but I would like to investigate the rational many Christians and other religious people have in justifying a certain religious belief. This religious belief entails their willingness to accept the reward by God of going to eternal bliss in heaven for eternity while at the same time accepting the fate of even their closest friends and family members spending eternity in everlasting torment, torture and excruciating pain and agony forever which makes the holocaust and any other man-made atrocity a mere slap on the wrist compared to this appalling set of conditions.
OK. In summation, why do I believe in Heaven and Hell...I'm not sure that I give them proper thought, but it was always my understanding that Hell was never directly created for disposal and storage of humans...it was to be the place where fallen spirits went. Humans ended up there by default, having chosen to follow said fallen spirits. But again...I don't give this stuff a lot of thought.
D.A.'s sig writes:
One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we've been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We're no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It is simply too painful to acknowledge -- even to ourselves -- that we've been so credulous. - Carl Sagan, The Fine Art of Baloney Detection
As a side-note, I saw your signature, and it reminded me of something that I just read from Henry Hazlitt "And as Mark Twain has remarked, "When even the brightest mind in our world has been trained from childhood in a superstition of any kind, it will never be possible for that mind, in its maturity, to examine sincerely, dispassionately, and conscientiously any evidence or
any circumstance which shall seem to cast a doubt upon the validity of that superstition."
Anyway, back to the topic....
Iano writes:
The rationale for justifying any of my beliefs stems from an overarching belief that the Bible is the word of God. Once I've accepted that, there isn't much need to justify any specific belief arising from that overarching acceptance: God says it's so - who am I to argue with God?
That cuts the argument rather short, however. For the sake of argument, are we allowed to bring the Bible into any sort of questioning? After all, IF God exists, and has given us the ability to reason, should we fear questioning Him?
DevilsAdvocate writes:
Here is what I think is happening:
a. The majority of Christians really do not believe that hell exists. Also they may compartmentalize the belief in hell so much that choose to deliberately ignore that it exists, which essentially means they do not believe it exists in all intensive purposes.
b. Many Christians only believe the worst offenders are going to hell.
c. Some Christians do not care that the majority of the human race is going to hell. Honestly, I think very few people really think this way unless they are truly self-centered people.
d. Very, very few Christians believe that hell truly exists and do care that the majority of the human race is going to hell and are doing everything in their power to save as many people as possible.
Honestly, I think most religious people fall into the first two categories even though the Bible itself clearly indicates only option D is the correct answer. In fact I would speculate that fewer than 1% of Christians are in the D category, otherwise you would have hundreds of people every day pleading with you to be saved from the everlasting, burning fires of hell and doing literally EVERYTHING in their power to pull you from such an awful horrendous existence. Of course this clearly does not happen so I suspect 99% of Christians fall into categories A and B.
I believe that God interacts with humanity in the present realm and under individual situations. I don't believe that God judges us based on what the book said in the past.
Iano writes:
The person who ends up in Hell did what they knew to be wrong..by suppressing the knowledge they had told them what they were about to do was wrong. Then they suppressed the guilt and shame that follows wrong doing. And they persisted along in that pattern their whole life through.
Yet surely God understands human psychology and knows that people are often in denial. Does He expect us to overcome our own defense mechanisms?
Iano writes:
They (The ones in Heaven) turned to God because God has designed it that those who don't willfully reject him to the bitter end will find him.
Could it not be argued that those who do willfully reject Him are just in a weaker state of mind and either have more of an addictive personality or more of a skeptical inquiring nature about them? Personally I believe that if God is judging us, He takes all of our defense mechanisms into account before passing judgment. And speaking of judgment...one more thing. Why can't God give those headed for Hell the option of ceasing to exist? Wouldn't that be an act of benevolence on His part? I mean, why force people who have chosen to reject Him to suffer? Whats the point there?
Edited by Phat, : mistake#1

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by DevilsAdvocate, posted 10-16-2009 7:05 PM DevilsAdvocate has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 79 by iano, posted 10-20-2009 6:43 AM Phat has seen this message but not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18349
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 103 of 410 (532231)
10-22-2009 6:24 AM
Reply to: Message 80 by Straggler
10-20-2009 7:28 AM


Re: Justification By Circular Definition?
Iano writes:
We'll use the word zog instead of righteous because it appears you've hang ups about the latter by virtue of attaching your own meaning of righteous onto God - something you're not prepared to do. So, Zog is a word used to describe "that which God does and things which, if done by others, are approved of by God"
Would you agree God is Zog by definition? If so, we can proceed... ..tomorrow.
Straggler writes:
OK. God is zog. By definition. Thus whatever god does is presumably zoggy by definition? In fact God is incapable of being un-zoggy by definition.
So how can we ever know what is zog and what is not without knowing the mind of God at any given time?
I want to live my life in a way that is consistent and zog. But how do I ever know what is zoggy and what isn't?
In any choice, any course of action, how do I know how to be zog so that I can avoid hell and achieve heaven?
Lets assume that God is good. God is love. God is justice. We will go with this word, Zog. God is Zog. (We don't yet know if God is also Anti-Zog or not) If the concept of anti-zog exists, it had to be either allowed (or created) by God or part of God.
Edited by Phat, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 80 by Straggler, posted 10-20-2009 7:28 AM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 125 by Straggler, posted 10-23-2009 6:47 PM Phat has replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18349
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 104 of 410 (532232)
10-22-2009 6:32 AM
Reply to: Message 92 by iano
10-21-2009 8:09 AM


Re: You do it to yourself you do - and that's what really hurts
Iano writes:
That a person might not believe in God at the time of their believing God in this matter isn't a problem. I mean, if their rebellion against God can be waged without belief in God then so can their surrendering.
So are you essentially saying that for the purpose of argument I could surrender to God even if I did not believe that God existed?
OK. Say that I surrendered and said that I would concede this particular argument fully to you, Ian. Now what?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 92 by iano, posted 10-21-2009 8:09 AM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 105 by iano, posted 10-22-2009 7:11 AM Phat has replied
 Message 107 by jaywill, posted 10-22-2009 9:29 AM Phat has replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18349
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 106 of 410 (532239)
10-22-2009 8:11 AM
Reply to: Message 105 by iano
10-22-2009 7:11 AM


Took The Step...Now What?
Iano writes:
Your saved. You are transferred from position lost to position found.
Am I supposed to feel any different than I did before? Am I supposed to somehow know God at this point versus merely knowing about Him? Is it possible to be saved and yet not even worry about religion at all?
Do actions count more than beliefs? Will beliefs (so imparted due to salvation) be cheerfully done in all cases? Finally, is it essential to belong to a church or could I go on being independent from organized religion??
Edited by Phat, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 105 by iano, posted 10-22-2009 7:11 AM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 110 by iano, posted 10-22-2009 9:45 AM Phat has seen this message but not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18349
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 109 of 410 (532251)
10-22-2009 9:43 AM
Reply to: Message 107 by jaywill
10-22-2009 9:29 AM


Re: You do it to yourself you do - and that's what really hurts
jaywill writes:
It would be nice if you were sincere. Since you probably are not what's next is of course more of the same for you -
collecting arguments, disputing, mocking, ignoring, trying to debunk, nullify, render irrelevant, reject and otherwise sneer at the counsels of God for yourself.
Whats so wrong with questioning what I have been taught? IMB, God is not going to shun me for challenging Iano. Everyone on this board has definite beliefs and opinions, and my intention is certainly not to mock God. After all, if God is as powerful as we believe that He is, I could hypothetically be flat out against Him and it would not make one bit of difference. Any good belief system should be able to stand every assault and challenge against it. Right?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 107 by jaywill, posted 10-22-2009 9:29 AM jaywill has not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18349
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 130 of 410 (532563)
10-24-2009 3:00 AM
Reply to: Message 125 by Straggler
10-23-2009 6:47 PM


Re: Justification By Circular Definition?
quote:
Lets assume that God is good. God is love. God is justice. We will go with this word, Zog. God is Zog. (We don't yet know if God is also Anti-Zog or not) If the concept of anti-zog exists, it had to be either allowed (or created) by God or part of God.
Straggler writes:
So God is also evil..........?
Good question.
Personally, I believe that God created the potential for evil to exist and that evil was done through willfully actualizing or fulfilling the potential.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 125 by Straggler, posted 10-23-2009 6:47 PM Straggler has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 160 by Straggler, posted 10-26-2009 3:58 PM Phat has not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18349
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 165 of 410 (532899)
10-27-2009 6:16 AM
Reply to: Message 158 by jaywill
10-26-2009 9:04 AM


Phat chance at redemption
jaywill writes:
I do not regard Hell (eternal perdition is what is meant here) as vindicative. The Ultimate Governor must show that He loves righteousness and hates iniquity. Rewards and punisments must be maintained to manifest that.
perdition \pr-"di-shn\ n 1 : eternal damnation 2 : hell
iniquity \i-"ni-kw-t\ n, pl -ties 1 : wickedness 2 : a wicked act

Shouldnt a Creator have the ability to eliminate wickedness? I still maintain that the option of being allowed to cease to exist is a more loving option than eternal damnation.
jaywill writes:
God must be true. He is not only a righteous Governor, He is the last and ultimate righteous Governor. He must manifest that beyond Him, behind Him, above Him, besides Him there is NO appeal.
I suppose that there is some reason that we humans need to be responsible for our choice of initiating rebellion and wickedness. I would think, however, that this particular Judge is not merely a Governor but a Creator as well...and if it disturbs you that I don't simply bow to His judgment, I will say that in my defense I am merely questioning the explanation that is commonly taught. Is it so bad to question what has been written and taught concerning such matters? I DO want to love God, but I simply must question what I am taught.
The patience and longsuffering of God causes some to be emboldened to condemn God as evil and themselves as righteous.
I am not in any way claiming to be righteous. I respect the idea of God being patient.
jaywill writes:
The details of how God works this fairness out, I do not know.
I am glad to see that you still have somewhat of an open mind on the possibility of Gods mercy above and beyond what is expected.
Onifre writes:
Science defines thoughts as the reaction to stimuli. The reaction is the thought, the reaction is real.
I read somewhere that thinking is a response to a problem...any problem...that arises in life. Were there no problems, no unexpected issues, there would be no need to think. We could even speculate that God has no need to think, at least in the manner we view thinking as...since God never encounters any unforeseen or challenging problems.
That brings up the question, timelessly and continually asked...of whether God foreknows what we will think and decide in our future.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 158 by jaywill, posted 10-26-2009 9:04 AM jaywill has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 166 by iano, posted 10-27-2009 8:46 AM Phat has replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18349
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 170 of 410 (532936)
10-27-2009 11:39 AM
Reply to: Message 166 by iano
10-27-2009 8:46 AM


Re: Phat chance at redemption
Your response was thoughtful....I guess that the God whom I imagine exists only for MY comfort while the God whom may actually be is fair towards all and desires not to punish but to teach and correct

This message is a reply to:
 Message 166 by iano, posted 10-27-2009 8:46 AM iano has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024