Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,903 Year: 4,160/9,624 Month: 1,031/974 Week: 358/286 Day: 1/13 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Dinosaurs 4500 years ago
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 764 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 12 of 87 (126020)
07-20-2004 5:12 PM
Reply to: Message 9 by Robert Byers
07-20-2004 4:13 PM


Oh, crud, Robert.
How long was the period from Eden to Flud? Was there time enough in those pre-Tertiary days to build reefs 500 meters thick from slow-growing corals? Was there time enough to deposit all the coal in Pennsylvania? How about to lay down 2500 meters of laminated shale/sandstone in the Delaware Basin? The White Cliffs of Dover?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by Robert Byers, posted 07-20-2004 4:13 PM Robert Byers has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 20 by Hangdawg13, posted 07-21-2004 11:47 PM Coragyps has replied

Coragyps
Member (Idle past 764 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 21 of 87 (126409)
07-21-2004 11:52 PM
Reply to: Message 17 by Hangdawg13
07-21-2004 11:29 PM


oes Precambrian rock include any strata? I was not aware of any fossilized organisms other than bacteria and such in rock below the sandstone strata.
They've even named a new geological period - the Ediacaran (formerly also called Vendian) because there are such a variety of fossils from just before the Cambrian. Many are bacterial/algal, but many more are multicellular. It's just pretty tough to decide what, if any, more modern forms many of them are related to. And the strata, even long before that, are present - they're harder to find because so many rocks that old have been reworked into new rock or gobbled up by plate tectonics.
And there are sandstones all through the geologic column - from last week back to the first appearance of moving water.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by Hangdawg13, posted 07-21-2004 11:29 PM Hangdawg13 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 26 by Hangdawg13, posted 07-22-2004 12:05 AM Coragyps has not replied

Coragyps
Member (Idle past 764 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 25 of 87 (126414)
07-22-2004 12:04 AM
Reply to: Message 20 by Hangdawg13
07-21-2004 11:47 PM


There is a process by which limestone can form quickly, but first I'd have to know... are the white cliffs of dover when analyzed diatomacious in nature or not? I'll have to look this up somewhere, if nobody knows.
Foraminifera throughout, as I remember it - certainly biogenic. And the Cliffs themselves dont represent the whole thickness of the Chalk in the subsurface.
of milimeter thick alternating layers of sandstone that have been bent and contorted without cracking or crumbling.
The Permian shale/sand in the Delaware alternates layers of organic-rich shale - from silt and microscopic sea life - with sand that was worked by wind, not water. Desert sand. 2500 meters thick in the center of the basin, with millimeter-scale laminations throughout. And it's localized to the Permian-era basin just south of the reef that makes up El Capitan. Nothing whatever to do with Walt Brown's "liquefaction."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by Hangdawg13, posted 07-21-2004 11:47 PM Hangdawg13 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 28 by Hangdawg13, posted 07-22-2004 12:10 AM Coragyps has replied

Coragyps
Member (Idle past 764 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 29 of 87 (126419)
07-22-2004 12:11 AM
Reply to: Message 24 by Hangdawg13
07-21-2004 11:59 PM


How many meters of sediment is the deepest Permian rock found?
Are you asking "how deep to the deepest Permian" or "how thick is the thickest Permian?" The Permian off Louisiana is surely at least 10 km from surface, if they've even drilled to it at all down there - I don't see Oil & Gas Journal any more to know what age those deep wells down there are in.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by Hangdawg13, posted 07-21-2004 11:59 PM Hangdawg13 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 32 by Hangdawg13, posted 07-22-2004 12:15 AM Coragyps has replied
 Message 33 by Hangdawg13, posted 07-22-2004 12:18 AM Coragyps has not replied

Coragyps
Member (Idle past 764 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 34 of 87 (126424)
07-22-2004 12:19 AM
Reply to: Message 28 by Hangdawg13
07-22-2004 12:10 AM


The Delaware Basin was a deep, smallish sea next to a large area of desert. In the wet season each year, silt washen in from rivers and critters/algae grew up near the surface, where there was light and oxygen. In the dry season, winds blew angular, faceted sand over the surface, and some sank. No erosion was going on 1000 meters down in the sea, and the area apparently kept subsiding over A Long Time to allow the few million alternate layers to build up.
El Capitan at the south end of the Guadelupe Mts. in New Mexico and Texas. It's near Carlsbad Caverns.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 28 by Hangdawg13, posted 07-22-2004 12:10 AM Hangdawg13 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 36 by Hangdawg13, posted 07-22-2004 12:25 AM Coragyps has not replied

Coragyps
Member (Idle past 764 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 35 of 87 (126428)
07-22-2004 12:25 AM
Reply to: Message 32 by Hangdawg13
07-22-2004 12:15 AM


I believe part of central Texas is called the permian Basin... I can't remember exactly where.
The place I'm sitting is on the Permian Basin's east edge. It's 1 to 2 km deep to the top of Permian most places out here - though it's on surface on to the east. I'll look at my map at work tomorrow and tell you more exactly where.
And I won't tell these West Texans that you said "central Texas" - they get real touchy about that kinda stuff out here.
Edit to add: I wasn't too clear on that El Capitan/the Guadelupes and the Delaware Basin have Permian at the surface.
This message has been edited by Coragyps, 07-21-2004 11:34 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by Hangdawg13, posted 07-22-2004 12:15 AM Hangdawg13 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 37 by Hangdawg13, posted 07-22-2004 12:28 AM Coragyps has replied

Coragyps
Member (Idle past 764 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 42 of 87 (126438)
07-22-2004 12:39 AM
Reply to: Message 37 by Hangdawg13
07-22-2004 12:28 AM


Wave - or call! - on your way through.
See if you can find "A Roadside Guide to New Mexico Geology" - the Texas equivalent is great! Very nice to tell what to look for and what it is you're seeing.
You can see El Capitan clearly from Carlsbad.
This message has been edited by Coragyps, 07-21-2004 11:41 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 37 by Hangdawg13, posted 07-22-2004 12:28 AM Hangdawg13 has not replied

Coragyps
Member (Idle past 764 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 49 of 87 (126616)
07-22-2004 1:42 PM
Reply to: Message 46 by Hangdawg13
07-22-2004 1:02 PM


In other words, why is most of the world's limestone inorganic in origin?
It isn't. By far the majority of limestone and dolomite started out as shells or tests of organisms - a lot of it has been reworked chemically since deposition. There was some inorganic precipitation, apparently, in the Cambrian and before, but the chemical makeup of the oceans since then doesn't let that happen.
Also, how did such immensly thick limestone formations occur? The Bahama's formation may be as deep as 6 miles.
Corals, etc. merely kept growing there as the seafloor slowly subsided. That's a much larger problem for a Flood scenario than for reality - how do you get six miles of coral to grow, and six miles of subsidence to occur, in a year?
This message has been edited by Coragyps, 07-22-2004 12:46 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by Hangdawg13, posted 07-22-2004 1:02 PM Hangdawg13 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 56 by Hangdawg13, posted 07-23-2004 2:15 AM Coragyps has not replied

Coragyps
Member (Idle past 764 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 86 of 87 (127555)
07-25-2004 9:00 PM
Reply to: Message 83 by Hangdawg13
07-25-2004 8:40 PM


Re: I hope I have saved you from twenty years of wasted effort.
adioactive decay (assuming the 3 bill years of decay measured by today's clocks) happened within 1200 years before the flood, might this in combination with the shear shifting be enough to completely melt the earth's core?
I don't think it would just stop with the core.....
let me check my calculations one time more, and I'll post what uranium decay alone would do to the crust. And I ignore what all that gamma radiation does to life on the crust....

This message is a reply to:
 Message 83 by Hangdawg13, posted 07-25-2004 8:40 PM Hangdawg13 has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024