Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,929 Year: 4,186/9,624 Month: 1,057/974 Week: 16/368 Day: 16/11 Hour: 0/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Chimpanzee-human genetic gap
ringo
Member (Idle past 443 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 39 of 244 (262680)
11-23-2005 11:33 AM
Reply to: Message 37 by Darwin's Terrier
11-23-2005 4:50 AM


Re: Hello Ray
Darwin's Terrier writes:
eg Karl Crawford's fireflies lighting the Ark
Two of them? Must have been big ones - kilowatt range, at least.

People who think they have all the answers usually don't understand the questions.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 37 by Darwin's Terrier, posted 11-23-2005 4:50 AM Darwin's Terrier has not replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 443 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 44 of 244 (263365)
11-26-2005 3:35 PM
Reply to: Message 43 by Cold Foreign Object
11-26-2005 2:22 PM


Herepton writes:
... which only exists in a context that declares the origin of living things was sudden supernatural special creation acts.
And that "declaration" has zero value as empirical evidence.
Any objective non-prejudicial observer looking at both sets of data must conclude that the DNA evidence of the Aaronic Priesthood far out weighs any chimp/human DNA similarities....
Of course the Cohens are all closely related because they're all human. Of course they're more closely related to each other than they are to chimps.
That says nothing about how closely related all humans are to chimps. In effect, you're saying: I'm more closely related to my brother than I am to you - therefore, I'm not related to you at all. But even the Bible says that you and I are related - our common ancestors include Noah and Adam.
... the issue is moot and further proves a major Biblical claim and its context.
No. Even if evolution was totally false, that wouldn't "prove" anything about the Bible. The Bible could still be totally false too.

People who think they have all the answers usually don't understand the questions.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 43 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 11-26-2005 2:22 PM Cold Foreign Object has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 45 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 12-04-2005 6:41 PM ringo has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 443 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 47 of 244 (265557)
12-04-2005 8:59 PM
Reply to: Message 45 by Cold Foreign Object
12-04-2005 6:41 PM


Herepton writes:
If the Cohen lineage in question descends from the Aaronic Priesthood (and it does) THEN the only context that Priesthood exists in enjoys the benefit of the evidence.
Nonsense. If the DNA evidence shows that all of the Cohens are related, then the DNA evidence is the only relevant context. It has nothing whatsoever to do with the Bible.
Similarly, the human/chimp DNA evidence is relevant only in its own context. There is no "special pleading".
Atheists always ask for evidence proving Biblical claims.
First, I am not an atheist. Second, I did not ask you for evidence for any Biblical claim. This is not a Bible forum. Please try to keep up.
Although I will recognize that your illogical abilities are "system wide"....
Anybody can see who is logically impaired here. Or is it just that you are unfamiliar with the English language? By the way, the "=" sign is not an English word.
since you actually believe apes morphed into men.
I never said any such thing. Please read before you post.
You do believe in miracles - ones that support your worldview.
I don't have a "world view". I can see quite a bit of it out my window, but I understand there's a whole lot over on the other side that I can't see from here.

People who think they have all the answers usually don't understand the questions.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 45 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 12-04-2005 6:41 PM Cold Foreign Object has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024