I've promoted it but please note that normally you supply a link AND discuss the issue in your own words.
Please follow up with some detail from that site. For example, since the difference is different from what has been bandied about before perhaps you could tell us what the new difference is and how it is calculated.
Without that the headline is meaningless.
This message has been edited by AdminNosy, 10-25-2005 03:02 PM
A more devestating response here might be to link to and/or copy some of the evidence that you have supplied. WK (and others) may not have noticed where you did this.
Simple making an assertion that it isn't true does look very convincing given your past history. ( I just can't resist asking if you've learned to read a map yet. )