Does evidence of transitional forms exist ? (Hominid and other)

Bearing in mind that "transitional forms" do not have to be direct ancestors, can you explain why archaeopteryx is not considered a valid transitional form ?And please show that this is the consensus of the scientific community rather than the opinions of creationists (who refuse to accept that there are transitional forms).

None of your points indicate that archaeopteryx is not a transitional. Nor that the scientific consensus agrees with your view.

quote:

---

HEY IF YOU THOUGHT THAT I AM A CREATIONIST THEN YOU ARE WRONG BUT SOME TRANSITIONAL FORMS WERE TURNED TO BE NOT SUCH THINGS SO WE NEED TO RETHINK OF SOME OF TRANSITIONAL FORMS NOW

---

I think that your rejection of genuine transitioanl fossils speaks for itself.{Added in edit}
I beleive that this is your source:
http://www.darwinismrefuted.com/20questions07.html
It makes the same points in the same order.
It is a Moslem Creationist siteEdited by PaulK, : New information.