Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Is evolution going backwards?
diggerdowner
Inactive Member


Message 50 of 84 (181376)
01-28-2005 1:33 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by contracycle
01-07-2005 8:57 AM


"fittest" & "backward"
This is RELATIVITY on a Human Basis. "...in the eye of the beholder." Darwinism wasn't invented by Darwin. Hebrews were the "Chosen People." Hitler had his 'superior races.' Most 'Sub-Humans' were killed or escaped into their less desired territories.
We have religious WARS, "purging," and we FEAR those "detestable" Hybrid Humans. We don't like our females to have hairy faces or legs, or butts! -so SHAVE! Hairy males are -starting- to be phased out, too - with TV, and females getting their 'say-so.'
DD

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by contracycle, posted 01-07-2005 8:57 AM contracycle has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 51 by crashfrog, posted 01-28-2005 1:44 PM diggerdowner has replied

  
diggerdowner
Inactive Member


Message 52 of 84 (181662)
01-29-2005 12:57 PM
Reply to: Message 51 by crashfrog
01-28-2005 1:44 PM


subjective?
If you're the Hairy Gorilla-type that gets selected against, in the Human/non-jungle World, you'd better get into the Jungle where you ARE the 'fittest' and can possibly pass on your genes - anyway! -
-- even if your kids come out as Hairy Gorilla-types.
But -- If the girls ain't yo' species -- They're probably gonna be sterile, or your kids will be, or some weird kind o' Hybrid.
-Eh? And, she better be willing! No Orangutan Rapes allowed!
DD

This message is a reply to:
 Message 51 by crashfrog, posted 01-28-2005 1:44 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 53 by crashfrog, posted 01-29-2005 1:14 PM diggerdowner has replied

  
diggerdowner
Inactive Member


Message 55 of 84 (182065)
01-31-2005 12:37 PM
Reply to: Message 53 by crashfrog
01-29-2005 1:14 PM


apologies... on subjection
Sorry,
I was trying to make light of how one not being 'fit' in one area, might have to try to be 'fit' somewhere else. (backward/forward)
-a rye comment toward Speciation. You guys are talking Psychological, and I talk Physical, as in "Hair."
-no offense.
DD

This message is a reply to:
 Message 53 by crashfrog, posted 01-29-2005 1:14 PM crashfrog has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024