THE END OF EVOLUTION?

Longitudinal pressure waves.

---

Genesis 2
17 But of the ponderosa pine, thou shalt not eat of it; for in the day that thou shinniest thereof thou shalt sorely learn of thy nakedness.
18 And we all live happily ever after.

Chopped liver signing off. Good night folks.

---

Genesis 2
17 But of the ponderosa pine, thou shalt not eat of it; for in the day that thou shinniest thereof thou shalt sorely learn of thy nakedness.
18 And we all live happily ever after.

I think what he means is that they are all Phylloscopus Trochiloies. What other research does a creationist need then a quick scan of a first sentence "Greenish warblers (Phylloscopus trochiloides) inhabit forests across much of northern and central Asia." of the introduction supplied by Coragyps?It's a spatial version of the rhetorical "Does mommy bird give birth to a baby bird of a differing species?" Pcver doesn't take into account how, exactly, one would go about labeling extreme members of a ring species as separate with a nomenclature that isn't suited to indiscrete grading. Where around the ring does one do the splitting. The birds on the ground have no problem with indiscrete grading. At least they're smart enough to figure it out. I'm not following you around, onifre. I wanted to address this hours ago but have been having computer problems. I spent my evening battling mighty mouse. Edited by lyx2no, : Indiscrete.Edited by lyx2no, : Indiscrete

---

Genesis 2
17 But of the ponderosa pine, thou shalt not eat of it; for in the day that thou shinniest thereof thou shalt sorely learn of thy nakedness.
18 And we all live happily ever after.

That's each individual in each generation, not between all individuals in that generation. And every individual has a different set of different types of mutations. That's a trillion human mutations per decade. Is that more believable? After all, it's well known that your believing it is the universal standard of reality. Edited by lyx2no, : Fix formating and get snarky.

---

Genesis 2
17 But of the ponderosa pine, thou shalt not eat of it; for in the day that thou shinniest thereof thou shalt sorely learn of thy nakedness.
18 And we all live happily ever after.

Though, "blasphemous" is clearly modifying "disrespect". Is this just poor English or is 777 under the impression that showing Christians disrespect is blasphemy?I agree with Theodoric: a none member of a group can not commit blasphemy against that group's beliefs any more then a Rwandan can be treasonous to Andorra.Edited by lyx2no, : Typo.Edited by lyx2no, : Double negative.

---

Genesis 2
17 But of the ponderosa pine, thou shalt not eat of it; for in the day that thou shinniest thereof thou shalt sorely learn of thy nakedness.
18 And we all live happily ever after.