Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,924 Year: 4,181/9,624 Month: 1,052/974 Week: 11/368 Day: 11/11 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   General Flood Topic
Randy
Member (Idle past 6278 days)
Posts: 420
From: Cincinnati OH USA
Joined: 07-19-2002


Message 13 of 42 (23434)
11-20-2002 10:34 PM
Reply to: Message 9 by Coragyps
11-19-2002 8:37 PM


quote:
Originally posted by Coragyps:
Fast currents would have a hard time depositing sediments with such slow sinking times as coccolithophorid tests...particularly without mixing in silts and clays.
Are you positing all the carbonates in the world being laid down in the "flood year"?

You don't understand. In TB's magic surging flood the currents could have been both fast and slow at the same time. As far as I can tell these surges are supposed to be able to do anything required by flood geologists to overcome the impossibilities in their models. They can come from any required direction, carry any required about of sediment any required distance and make as many layers of whatever type as needed during the flood year, even with time for animals to come in from "high ground" and make tracks and build nests and for trees to grow and soils to form between surges so why couldn't they have both fast and slow currents at the same time?
Randy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by Coragyps, posted 11-19-2002 8:37 PM Coragyps has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 14 by wj, posted 11-20-2002 11:15 PM Randy has not replied
 Message 15 by Coragyps, posted 11-21-2002 1:17 PM Randy has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024