Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,927 Year: 4,184/9,624 Month: 1,055/974 Week: 14/368 Day: 14/11 Hour: 2/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   General Flood Topic
Tranquility Base
Inactive Member


Message 4 of 42 (23170)
11-19-2002 12:21 AM
Reply to: Message 3 by Coragyps
11-18-2002 9:55 PM


Coragyps
Can you explain vast ages of chalk from a uniformitarianistic POV can you?
I'd love to hear that.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by Coragyps, posted 11-18-2002 9:55 PM Coragyps has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by edge, posted 11-19-2002 12:02 PM Tranquility Base has replied
 Message 7 by Coragyps, posted 11-19-2002 7:27 PM Tranquility Base has replied

  
Tranquility Base
Inactive Member


Message 6 of 42 (23285)
11-19-2002 5:44 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by edge
11-19-2002 12:02 PM


^ It's still incredible vertical amounts of chalk over vast areas Edge, and you know it, and unless I'm mistaken, the major chalk deposits around the world occur preferentially in certain of your 'eras'.
Same with coal.
[This message has been edited by Tranquility Base, 11-19-2002]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by edge, posted 11-19-2002 12:02 PM edge has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 10 by edge, posted 11-19-2002 11:23 PM Tranquility Base has not replied

  
Tranquility Base
Inactive Member


Message 8 of 42 (23298)
11-19-2002 8:19 PM
Reply to: Message 7 by Coragyps
11-19-2002 7:27 PM


^ Why predominantly in one point in time and why so abrruptly at both interfaces? Why so incredibly enriched?
Our explanation?
Same as yours, but the abruptness and enrichment are explained by catastrophic sorting. Fast currents can sort materials to high purity. It represented a stage in the flood and hence explains why we get this primarily at only a few points in the geo-col.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by Coragyps, posted 11-19-2002 7:27 PM Coragyps has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by Coragyps, posted 11-19-2002 8:37 PM Tranquility Base has not replied
 Message 11 by edge, posted 11-19-2002 11:30 PM Tranquility Base has not replied
 Message 16 by wehappyfew, posted 11-21-2002 11:59 PM Tranquility Base has not replied

  
Tranquility Base
Inactive Member


Message 31 of 42 (26909)
12-16-2002 9:24 PM
Reply to: Message 28 by wehappyfew
12-07-2002 12:29 PM


I'm actually quite interested in this issue Wehappy. I simply have nothing to contribute. It seems to me so far that there is sufficeint room to suggest that much of the calcium could have an inorganic origin. I agree that current limestone depositon is primarily biogenic but the flood was a little different than curent processes. I await further clarification (as opposed to simply your expectation vs ours) on these issues from all of you.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 28 by wehappyfew, posted 12-07-2002 12:29 PM wehappyfew has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 32 by edge, posted 12-16-2002 9:31 PM Tranquility Base has not replied
 Message 33 by Coragyps, posted 12-17-2002 9:54 AM Tranquility Base has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024