not which wiki or other source of information
Really Buz, when you are attributing something is does make quite a difference because some sources just are more reliable than others, it just so happens that wikipedia isn't always in the reliable category either, but the idea that the source of a claim is irrelevant is only true if there is other evidence supporting the claim.
If not, it's your job to falsify the data cited.
OK, it is falsified by the fact that the article doesn't go on to enumerate any of his technical publications. I don't see how it is my job to go out and fact check an Creationwiki with absolutely no guide as to where these publications are supposed to be.
Going by that page almost all of his publications are in the ICR's own journal or other creationist journals, hardly independent validation of his scientific credentials. I can find one other paper in the International Geology Review but after that I can't find anything.
So do
you know where all his non-creationist journal published technical papers are? Because Creationwiki won't tell me, nor will the ICR's own site.
TTFN,
WK