It must also be considered that Darwin's contribution was ECONOMICso that it is not as easy as any policy to simply compare with indifferent relations to pedagogy, for in that case it would be considered that my brother who works as a consultant for BLACKBOARD, a good salary, a non IVY league education, and a mortage to have done well, better than me, and is contributing "more" but I had taken on a problem in science NOT simply one of rasing a check balance, but in this case the comparison IS economic as to survival BASED on what is under discussion, so= I still have no means to make the comparison. If one granted marxism or such it might be possible but all of the politics would need to not gerrymandered in as well.
wHAT IS not different is that Darwin's day and the economics of today DO have a ceiling environment which in science might not exist provided we ARE the future. We arenot.
™ Version 4.2
