Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,910 Year: 4,167/9,624 Month: 1,038/974 Week: 365/286 Day: 8/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Moral Judgments
bob_gray
Member (Idle past 5043 days)
Posts: 243
From: Virginia
Joined: 05-03-2004


Message 46 of 259 (175219)
01-09-2005 12:39 PM
Reply to: Message 44 by Tal
01-09-2005 9:39 AM


Re: Higher Laws
Could I say common sense and get away with it?
You could but that would open a whole can of worms as to what is "common sense".
There is also a verse in the bible that says, "Go build an ark of gopher wood." But you don't see me running out to Home Depot.
In the defense of those who believe in the OT but are not building arks God was specifically talking to Noah here.
As to which of the levitical laws we should follow? None, we should follow the laws that our government has set for us (I'll have to look up the chapter/verse in the NT, but in there it says to obey the laws of the land).
But what if someone tries to use Leviticus to establish the "laws of the land"? Shouldn't we first determine which parts to use and which parts to throw away? I think that if we are going to be using Leviticus we need to firmly establish the criteria for determining what is useful. I really thing that common sense isn't going to be sufficient because it is clear that some things which are obvious to me are not obvious to others and vice versa.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 44 by Tal, posted 01-09-2005 9:39 AM Tal has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 49 by Tal, posted 01-10-2005 2:25 AM bob_gray has not replied

  
mike the wiz
Member
Posts: 4755
From: u.k
Joined: 05-24-2003


Message 47 of 259 (175339)
01-09-2005 8:57 PM
Reply to: Message 40 by nator
01-08-2005 9:29 AM


True, but do you believe in the whole Bible or not?
The Bible includes Leviticus, does it not?
Do you reject the OT or just the parts of it you don't like?
I don't reject the bible, I'm just not under the law. The NT says that if you're under the law - then the cross has no effect. "The law of sin and death" or the "law of the Spirit of life".
We don't live by the law Shraff - you should know that this is not to reject the law - because Christ fulfilled it. Surely you know this by now Shraff?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 40 by nator, posted 01-08-2005 9:29 AM nator has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 50 by Rrhain, posted 01-10-2005 2:39 AM mike the wiz has replied

  
Tal
Member (Idle past 5707 days)
Posts: 1140
From: Fort Bragg, NC
Joined: 12-29-2004


Message 48 of 259 (175378)
01-10-2005 2:23 AM
Reply to: Message 45 by nator
01-09-2005 10:56 AM


Re: Higher Laws
It's as wrong as 2 boys kissing.

Then I heard the voice of the Lord saying, "Whom shall I send? And who will go for us?" And I said, "Here am I. Send me!" Isaiah 6:8
No webpage found at provided URL: www.1st-vets.us

This message is a reply to:
 Message 45 by nator, posted 01-09-2005 10:56 AM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 51 by Rrhain, posted 01-10-2005 2:40 AM Tal has not replied
 Message 55 by nator, posted 01-10-2005 10:00 AM Tal has replied

  
Tal
Member (Idle past 5707 days)
Posts: 1140
From: Fort Bragg, NC
Joined: 12-29-2004


Message 49 of 259 (175379)
01-10-2005 2:25 AM
Reply to: Message 46 by bob_gray
01-09-2005 12:39 PM


Re: Higher Laws
In the defense of those who believe in the OT but are not building arks God was specifically talking to Noah here.
And the levitical law was specifically for Isreal back in the day.
But what if someone tries to use Leviticus to establish the "laws of the land"? Shouldn't we first determine which parts to use and which parts to throw away? I think that if we are going to be using Leviticus we need to firmly establish the criteria for determining what is useful. I really thing that common sense isn't going to be sufficient because it is clear that some things which are obvious to me are not obvious to others and vice versa.
Example of a levitical law you would like to see passed?

Then I heard the voice of the Lord saying, "Whom shall I send? And who will go for us?" And I said, "Here am I. Send me!" Isaiah 6:8
No webpage found at provided URL: www.1st-vets.us

This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by bob_gray, posted 01-09-2005 12:39 PM bob_gray has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 52 by Rrhain, posted 01-10-2005 2:43 AM Tal has replied

  
Rrhain
Member
Posts: 6351
From: San Diego, CA, USA
Joined: 05-03-2003


Message 50 of 259 (175384)
01-10-2005 2:39 AM
Reply to: Message 47 by mike the wiz
01-09-2005 8:57 PM


mike the wiz writes:
quote:
The NT says that if you're under the law - then the cross has no effect.
But the NT also says that everyone is supposed to be under the law.
Not one jot, not one tittle of the law shall be changed till all be fulfilled.
You were circumcised at age eight by a mohel, were you not? You keep kosher, do you not?
Jesus was very clear: Mosaic law is still in full effect.
quote:
We don't live by the law Shraff - you should know that this is not to reject the law - because Christ fulfilled it.
But the world hasn't ended. Therefore, not all has been fulfilled.
Therefore, the law is still in effect.
And, of course, Jesus couldn't possibly have fulfilled the law. He claimed to be the son of god which is precisely what the Messiah is NOT. That would be in direct violation of the very first commandment: Thou shalt have no other gods before me.
The Messiah is a man who would personally usher in the unification of Zion through force and violence. No miracles (except those performed by god since only god can perform miracles...don't you remember what god said to Moses?) no "son of god," just a warrior king.
Jesus didn't do that. Ergo, Jesus was not the Messiah.
You act like Jews don't understand their own religion. How insulting.

Rrhain
WWJD? JWRTFM!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by mike the wiz, posted 01-09-2005 8:57 PM mike the wiz has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 116 by mike the wiz, posted 01-11-2005 5:07 PM Rrhain has replied

  
Rrhain
Member
Posts: 6351
From: San Diego, CA, USA
Joined: 05-03-2003


Message 51 of 259 (175386)
01-10-2005 2:40 AM
Reply to: Message 48 by Tal
01-10-2005 2:23 AM


Re: Higher Laws
Tal writes:
quote:
It's as wrong as 2 boys kissing.
And since two boys kissing isn't wrong...?

Rrhain
WWJD? JWRTFM!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by Tal, posted 01-10-2005 2:23 AM Tal has not replied

  
Rrhain
Member
Posts: 6351
From: San Diego, CA, USA
Joined: 05-03-2003


Message 52 of 259 (175389)
01-10-2005 2:43 AM
Reply to: Message 49 by Tal
01-10-2005 2:25 AM


Re: Higher Laws
Tal writes:
quote:
And the levitical law was specifically for Isreal back in the day.
No, Mosaic law applies to everyone. Haven't you read your own holy book? Jesus is quite specific: Not one jot, not one tittle of the law shall be changed till all be fulfilled.
All has not been fulfilled.
Ergo, the law is still in effect.
I do hope you were circumcised in the correct religious manner. And I certainly hope you've been keeping kosher.
Not one jot, not one tittle.
Who are you going to believe, Paul or Jesus?

Rrhain
WWJD? JWRTFM!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by Tal, posted 01-10-2005 2:25 AM Tal has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 53 by arachnophilia, posted 01-10-2005 2:56 AM Rrhain has not replied
 Message 54 by Tal, posted 01-10-2005 4:04 AM Rrhain has replied

  
arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1373 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 53 of 259 (175393)
01-10-2005 2:56 AM
Reply to: Message 52 by Rrhain
01-10-2005 2:43 AM


Re: Higher Laws
No, Mosaic law applies to everyone. Haven't you read your own holy book? Jesus is quite specific: Not one jot, not one tittle of the law shall be changed till all be fulfilled.
actually, mosaic law hinges on the condition that your people were brought out of egypt. the ten commandments for instance are a form of treaty between a greater power (god) and a lesser power (israel). it starts by heralding the reasons the lesser owes the greater something, and then listing what is owed. it's a very standard form in the ancient middle east, i hear. but the thing it heralds is the exodus.
if it didn't happen, or your family wasn't a part of it, it doesn't really apply, technically.
and LEVITICAL law was only for the levites. it's a tribe specific set of ordinances.
Who are you going to believe, Paul or Jesus?
i still side with jesus though.
This message has been edited by Arachnophilia, 01-10-2005 02:56 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 52 by Rrhain, posted 01-10-2005 2:43 AM Rrhain has not replied

  
Tal
Member (Idle past 5707 days)
Posts: 1140
From: Fort Bragg, NC
Joined: 12-29-2004


Message 54 of 259 (175405)
01-10-2005 4:04 AM
Reply to: Message 52 by Rrhain
01-10-2005 2:43 AM


Re: Higher Laws
All has not been fulfilled.
Ergo, the law is still in effect.
I do hope you were circumcised in the correct religious manner. And I certainly hope you've been keeping kosher.
Not one jot, not one tittle.
It's a good thing it is not up to us to fulfill the law.
Matthew 5:17,18 Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. I tell you the truth, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished.

Then I heard the voice of the Lord saying, "Whom shall I send? And who will go for us?" And I said, "Here am I. Send me!" Isaiah 6:8
No webpage found at provided URL: www.1st-vets.us

This message is a reply to:
 Message 52 by Rrhain, posted 01-10-2005 2:43 AM Rrhain has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 62 by bob_gray, posted 01-10-2005 12:10 PM Tal has not replied
 Message 168 by Rrhain, posted 01-12-2005 11:46 PM Tal has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2199 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 55 of 259 (175449)
01-10-2005 10:00 AM
Reply to: Message 48 by Tal
01-10-2005 2:23 AM


Re: Higher Laws
quote:
It's as wrong as 2 boys kissing.
Well, then, there's nothing wrong with that, if both boys want to be kissing each other.
Right?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by Tal, posted 01-10-2005 2:23 AM Tal has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 56 by Tal, posted 01-10-2005 10:10 AM nator has replied

  
Tal
Member (Idle past 5707 days)
Posts: 1140
From: Fort Bragg, NC
Joined: 12-29-2004


Message 56 of 259 (175453)
01-10-2005 10:10 AM
Reply to: Message 55 by nator
01-10-2005 10:00 AM


Re: Higher Laws
What if I want to kiss your 7 year old daughter?
There's nothing wrong with that right?

Then I heard the voice of the Lord saying, "Whom shall I send? And who will go for us?" And I said, "Here am I. Send me!" Isaiah 6:8
No webpage found at provided URL: www.1st-vets.us

This message is a reply to:
 Message 55 by nator, posted 01-10-2005 10:00 AM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 58 by nator, posted 01-10-2005 11:27 AM Tal has not replied
 Message 59 by berberry, posted 01-10-2005 11:28 AM Tal has not replied
 Message 169 by Rrhain, posted 01-12-2005 11:49 PM Tal has not replied
 Message 194 by tsig, posted 01-14-2005 3:09 AM Tal has not replied

  
contracycle
Inactive Member


Message 57 of 259 (175475)
01-10-2005 11:19 AM
Reply to: Message 33 by Hangdawg13
01-07-2005 3:40 PM


quote:
How can I use his argument word for word if I've never heard of him?
Because its common in all Christian countries with serving militaries. Its the standard chritsian apologetic for war.
quote:
The Hebrew word, which you translate "kill" means "murder". Perhaps there is no difference between the two in your mind.
Of course there is no difference. Such alleged difference as may be perceived depens ona dubious "just war". So once again we see self-described Christians choosing not to follow the word of god.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 33 by Hangdawg13, posted 01-07-2005 3:40 PM Hangdawg13 has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2199 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 58 of 259 (175479)
01-10-2005 11:27 AM
Reply to: Message 56 by Tal
01-10-2005 10:10 AM


Re: Higher Laws
quote:
What if I want to kiss your 7 year old daughter?
There's nothing wrong with that right?
Of course there's something wrong with that, because you are an adult and my 7 year old daughter is clearly a child, who cannot give her consent.
Anyway, your question above has nothing at all to do with your views on homosexuality as they relate to if you follow Levitical law or not.
If you say that you do not have to follow Levitical law, then do you think that homosexuality is wrong?
If you do, why?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 56 by Tal, posted 01-10-2005 10:10 AM Tal has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 63 by Silent H, posted 01-10-2005 12:15 PM nator has replied

  
berberry
Inactive Member


Message 59 of 259 (175480)
01-10-2005 11:28 AM
Reply to: Message 56 by Tal
01-10-2005 10:10 AM


Re: Higher Laws
Tal errs:
quote:
What if I want to kiss your 7 year old daughter?
There's nothing wrong with that right?
A romantic kiss? Hell no it's not all right. You're an adult, you idiot! You have no business sharing a romantic kiss with a 7-year-old child. It makes no difference whether it's a girl or a boy. How dare you compare that to two boys kissing each other! Are you a pervert?

Keep America Safe AND Free!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 56 by Tal, posted 01-10-2005 10:10 AM Tal has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 61 by Silent H, posted 01-10-2005 12:08 PM berberry has replied

  
contracycle
Inactive Member


Message 60 of 259 (175484)
01-10-2005 11:43 AM
Reply to: Message 37 by mike the wiz
01-07-2005 8:56 PM


quote:
But Jesus says to not even get angry. And to let him without sin cast the first stone..
Where does it say this in the muslim book? Or other religions?
Lots of places. The Qu'ran is a much more humanistic, sympathetic work than the bible, shockingly so in fact.
Goodness and evil are not equal.
Repel evil with what is better.
Then that person with whom there was hatred,
may become your intimate friend!
And no one will be granted such goodness
except those who exercise patience and self-restraint,
none but people of the greatest good fortune.
Qur'an 41:34-35
"And if you punish, you shall inflict an equivalent punishment. But if you resort to patience (instead of revenge), it would be better for the patient ones. (16:26)
"...anyone who kills any person who had not committed murder or horrendous crimes, it shall be as if he killed all the people. And anyone who spares a life, it shall be as if he spared the lives of all the people..." (5:32)
"If one amongst the Pagans ask thee for asylum,grant it to him, so that he may hear the word of Allah; and then escort him to where he can be secure that is because they are men without knowledge."
[Al-Qur'an 9:6]
"Those who invoke not, with God, any other god, nor slay such life as God has made sacred except for just cause, nor commit fornication; - and any that does this (not only) meets punishment. (But) the Penalty on the Day Of Judgement will be doubled To him, and he will dwell Therein in ignominy. (The Noble Quran, 25:68-69)"
Tal wrote:
quote:
Jesus instituted higher laws. What I mean by that is that Jesus' laws override the OT laws. Example: In the old testament the law states "Eye for an eye." Equate that to the law of gravity. Jesus came and set a new law, "Turn the other cheek." Equate that to the law of lift. The law of lift overrides the law of gravity.
The Qu'ran echoes:
"We ordained therein for them: "Life for life, eye for eye, nose or nose, ear for ear, tooth for tooth, and wounds equal for equal." But if any one remits the retaliation by way of charity, it is an act of atonement for himself. And if any fail to judge by (the light of) what God hath revealed, they are (No better than) wrong-doers. (The Noble Quran, 5:45)"
This message has been edited by contracycle, 01-10-2005 11:47 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 37 by mike the wiz, posted 01-07-2005 8:56 PM mike the wiz has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024