Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,929 Year: 4,186/9,624 Month: 1,057/974 Week: 16/368 Day: 16/11 Hour: 0/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   War and Majority
edge
Member (Idle past 1737 days)
Posts: 4696
From: Colorado, USA
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 8 of 100 (30344)
01-27-2003 3:08 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by shilohproject
01-27-2003 2:52 PM


quote:
My suggestion that there may be a relationship between the election and the administration's current position is this: give them an inch and they'll take a yard. There may well be a sense that no public mandate is really needed, afterall, since none was needed in the election. It's the ol' I-can-do-whatever-I-want mentallity.
Perhaps I'm reading this all wrong. But it is a concern of mine.
-Shiloh
Usually, the opposite it the case. A mandate gives one a mantle of invincibility and confidence. History tells us that presidents who lose the popular vote to win in the electoral college generally have impotent presidencies. Hayes was so frustrated that he announced he would not run again sometime in mid-term. Of course that only made things worse. It is possible that 9-11 changed this to some degree.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by shilohproject, posted 01-27-2003 2:52 PM shilohproject has not replied

edge
Member (Idle past 1737 days)
Posts: 4696
From: Colorado, USA
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 47 of 100 (31379)
02-04-2003 11:33 PM
Reply to: Message 46 by Silent H
02-04-2003 7:16 PM


quote:
Think that's going to happen to any arabic looking ... and a US CONGRESSMAN?
Heck, that's prbably why he got a reduced sentence....

This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by Silent H, posted 02-04-2003 7:16 PM Silent H has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024