Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Noah's Flood and the Geologic Layers (was Noah's shallow sea)
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 764 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 10 of 213 (83500)
02-05-2004 5:36 PM
Reply to: Message 7 by simple
02-05-2004 4:39 PM


Re: flint stones
I heard there was more limestone than uniformism can account for,
Where'd you hear that? Here beneath my house there's perhaps a mile of limestone and dolostone, all seemingly of organic origin. Do you, simple, think it's more probable that all the various organisms that grew shells and tests to make all that died in a single year, or over a slightly longer time? How fast can a reef grow? Can you or Dr Brown provide some data on that rate?
More than Uniformism can account for? Is that less than a year of Waltian limestone deposition?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by simple, posted 02-05-2004 4:39 PM simple has not replied

Coragyps
Member (Idle past 764 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 37 of 213 (83978)
02-06-2004 4:53 PM
Reply to: Message 32 by simple
02-06-2004 4:46 PM


Re: scurry for an answer
Or could some huge chunk of land be carried away, with scurriers in it to be deposited later?
You're proposing that this Flood picked up a couple of counties in Arizona, complete with sand dunes and gopher burrows, and moved it out into the middle of a sea before dropping it? And the dunes and burrows didn't notice it happening?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by simple, posted 02-06-2004 4:46 PM simple has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 42 by simple, posted 02-06-2004 5:22 PM Coragyps has not replied

Coragyps
Member (Idle past 764 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 79 of 213 (84525)
02-08-2004 6:07 PM
Reply to: Message 75 by JonF
02-07-2004 2:55 PM


Re: 'the force is stong in this one'
Now, J. M. Hunt (John M. Hunt, Petroleum Geochemistry and Geology, (New York: W. H. Freeman and Co., 1996), p. 19) Says that there are 51,100 x 10^18 grams of limestone on earth.
Okay ..... the present atmosphere weighs 5100 x 10^18 grams, a tenth of what Hunt claims our limestone weighs. Limestone, whether organically or inorganically produced, falls out of water due to yhe reaction
Ca(HCO3)2 --> CaCO3 + H2O + CO2
where CaCO3 is calcium carbonate = limestone. The amount of CO2, carbon dioxide, liberated in this process is 44% of the weight of limestone produced, by high-school chemical calculations. So that's 4.4 times as much CO2 as the entire weight of the atmosphere. And Dr Brown needs this to all form in a single year, with a boat full of critters and folks surviving through it. My calculations have this influx of CO2 reducing the air's oxygen content from 21% down to 3.9%, while raising the pressure to 79 psi (now 14.7).
That would be a little tough to breathe, Simple. And as has been pointed out, "uniformism" accomodates this CO2 slug very nicely - plants convert it back to oxygen, if you give them enough time to grow and do so. They can't manage it in a single year, as witnessed by their inability to recycle fossil CO2 as fast as we put it into the atmosphere - and that's only on the order of 10^16 grams per year, not 10^22 - a millionth of what Walt needs to dispose of.
[This message has been edited by Coragyps, 02-08-2004]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 75 by JonF, posted 02-07-2004 2:55 PM JonF has not replied

Coragyps
Member (Idle past 764 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 81 of 213 (84541)
02-08-2004 7:37 PM
Reply to: Message 80 by simple
02-08-2004 7:16 PM


Re: pick a plauseable please people
only modern rock contains much aragonite.
And since aragonite is thermodynamically unstable with respect to calcite, we expect it to do what over time? Class?
{Abusing my admin power, I'll put the answer right here - Aragonite and Calcite are what's called polymorphs of CaCO3. Same chemical composition, but different crystal structure. Aragonite recrystalizes to Calcite. - Adminnemooseus, posting for minnemooseus}
[This message has been edited by Adminnemooseus, 02-08-2004]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 80 by simple, posted 02-08-2004 7:16 PM simple has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 82 by Joe Meert, posted 02-08-2004 8:48 PM Coragyps has not replied
 Message 83 by simple, posted 02-09-2004 2:40 AM Coragyps has not replied

Coragyps
Member (Idle past 764 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 161 of 213 (86072)
02-13-2004 11:33 AM
Reply to: Message 160 by simple
02-13-2004 11:22 AM


Re: Geology explained
The short answer is I don't know. I think your answer should be the same. ---Unless you can prove any layer was not a part of these events, I'll assume they are.----
I've mentioned El Capitan somewhere on one of these threads you've been on, simple. It's a mountain a couple of hundred miles from here. It has about 1600 vertical feet of limestone, formed almost completely of the skeletons of calcareous sponges, largely in the positions in which the grew. How long does it take, do you think, to grow a layer of sponges a half-kilometer thick, if each one grows a couple of centimeters tall, and takes a year or two to do so? And why are there no sponges alive today of the many species whose parts make up this mountain?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 160 by simple, posted 02-13-2004 11:22 AM simple has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 165 by simple, posted 02-13-2004 12:21 PM Coragyps has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024