Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,906 Year: 4,163/9,624 Month: 1,034/974 Week: 361/286 Day: 4/13 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Just what IS terrorism?
bob_gray
Member (Idle past 5043 days)
Posts: 243
From: Virginia
Joined: 05-03-2004


Message 13 of 112 (159256)
11-14-2004 12:12 AM
Reply to: Message 7 by pink sasquatch
11-13-2004 7:38 PM


Re: a definition
I'm not saying that your friend wasn't taught this definition but from what I have read the official US definition is something to the effect of "Terrorism is the calculated use of violence or the threat of violence to attain religious or political ideological goals though intimidation, coercion or instilling fear." I think this is a fairly reasonable definition of terrorism. Unfortunately by this definition the US may well be the biggest terrorist state. Our invasion of Afghanistan might even be considered terrorism by this definition. We basically said, "Give us Osama or we will invade." (ie. the threat of violence to attain political goals through intimitadion.)
Not that this is really unusual. I expect that almost all governments engage or have engaged in terrorism of some type. What makes ours stand out is that we are large, have an enormous capacity dole out violence and are wealthy enough to support terrorist states all over the globe.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by pink sasquatch, posted 11-13-2004 7:38 PM pink sasquatch has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 40 by Tusko, posted 11-16-2004 10:51 AM bob_gray has replied

  
bob_gray
Member (Idle past 5043 days)
Posts: 243
From: Virginia
Joined: 05-03-2004


Message 81 of 112 (161957)
11-20-2004 8:45 PM
Reply to: Message 40 by Tusko
11-16-2004 10:51 AM


Re: a definition
I'm not sure if that specific situation counts as terrorism. If my understanding of the situation is correct Hussein had signed a treaty at the end of the first gulf war which allowed the UN to verify that he didn't have WMD programs. Since he wasn't complying with that treaty congress authorized Bush to use force to enforce it. Of course he took it one step further and didn't just strong-arm Iraq into complying he actually invaded while the inspections were taking place. While I don't agree with the war I don't think it was terrorism but rather an unjust war (which in many ways is worse). I think that brings us to the discussion in which Jar is involved about war crimes/terrorism.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 40 by Tusko, posted 11-16-2004 10:51 AM Tusko has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024