Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,914 Year: 4,171/9,624 Month: 1,042/974 Week: 1/368 Day: 1/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   "The Bloop" - are sea monsters a reality?
Modulous
Member
Posts: 7801
From: Manchester, UK
Joined: 05-01-2005


Message 1 of 16 (298251)
03-26-2006 7:33 AM


Several times during the summer 1997 the Equatorial Pacific Ocean autonomous hydrophone array repeatedly picked up a "Bloop" sound emanating from somewhere in the region of here (ie the middle of nowhere).
Listen to the Bloop speeded by 16 times
Listen to it at its original speed.
Why am I bringing this up? Good question! Experts on the subject of marine noises are fairly unanimous in agreement: It bears all the signs of being a marine animal that makes it. The problem - it was detected by sensors about 4,800km apart...not even whale song is loud enough to travel that kind of distance. The origin of the noise must have been louder than whales. This strongly implies that the creature that made it had to be truly enormous...a veritable Leviathan
Some have postulated it is a giant squid of some kind, though Phil Lobel, a marine biologist at Boston University says:
"Cephalopods have no gas-filled sac, so they have no way to make that type of noise...Though you can never rule anything out completely, I doubt it."
Thought it might make an interesting discussion point since large animals have been a bit of a topic recently
Any crazy theories out there? This site enjoys a tongue in cheek fantasy about Cthulu - the first thing I thought of when I heard about it.
Associated news sites: CNN
The Age
If this is a gigantic sea monster of some kind, it just goes to show how much we don't know about the depths of the ocean.
This message has been edited by Modulous, Sun, 26-March-2006 12:34 PM

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by sidelined, posted 03-26-2006 9:34 AM Modulous has replied
 Message 4 by ReverendDG, posted 03-26-2006 10:21 AM Modulous has not replied
 Message 11 by Gary, posted 03-29-2006 9:04 PM Modulous has not replied
 Message 14 by macaroniandcheese, posted 03-30-2006 1:54 PM Modulous has not replied

  
Modulous
Member
Posts: 7801
From: Manchester, UK
Joined: 05-01-2005


Message 3 of 16 (298275)
03-26-2006 10:12 AM
Reply to: Message 2 by sidelined
03-26-2006 9:34 AM


Skepticism is always good, but I'm willing to trust NOAA aren't perpetrating fraud.
. As near as I can tell there has only been one sond recording of the "bloop".
The sound was heard on several occasions - only one recording seems to be on the internet. Here is NOAA's description:
NOAA writes:
This sound was repeatedly recorded during summer, 1997 on the Equatorial Pacific Ocean autonomous hydrophone array. The sound rises rapidly in frequency over about one minute and was of sufficient amplitude to be heard on multiple sensors, at a range of over 5,000 km. It yields a general location near 50oS; 100oW. The origin of the sound is unknown.
It also gets mentioned in The Journal of Accoustic Ecology:
JAE writes:
There are also two mystery sounds. The first is “Slow Down”
recorded May 19, 1997 at the Equatorial Pacific Ocean
autonomous hydrophone array. The sound slowly descends in
frequency over about 7 minutes and was of sufficient amplitude
to be heard.This type of signal has not been heard before or since.
The second is called, “Bloop” and was repeatedly recorded
during the summer of 1997.
The rest of the information is as provided on the NOAA site.
You are right though, the investigator in me craves more information about the subject, and there is scarcely on t'net.
This message has been edited by Modulous, Sun, 26-March-2006 03:14 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by sidelined, posted 03-26-2006 9:34 AM sidelined has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by jar, posted 03-26-2006 12:01 PM Modulous has not replied

  
Modulous
Member
Posts: 7801
From: Manchester, UK
Joined: 05-01-2005


Message 9 of 16 (298585)
03-27-2006 9:02 AM
Reply to: Message 7 by jar
03-26-2006 12:28 PM


Or it could be related to some acoustic pathway that amplifies and transmits normal volume sounds particularly well, like the ever present whisper rooms in science museums.
It could well be location dependant as opposed to critter dependant.
Such a phenomenon exists, it's called the SOFAR channel and the hydrophones take advantage of it. Maybe there is another one, but I'd imagine the accoustics of the area are fairly well studied.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by jar, posted 03-26-2006 12:28 PM jar has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 10 by riVeRraT, posted 03-29-2006 1:53 PM Modulous has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024