note: this discussion has turned for the better;read pgs/Where do the laws come from?

Laws are mere human inventions.However, if you are asking how did those laws come about to govern the universe, well, at speific periods of time after the Big Bang, as the universe cooled down, different forces started to appear. (I am definatly not an expert on BB, a lot of people on this forum can explain better).Edited by Nutcase, : No reason given.

I'll try a different approach.. Things are the way they are because otherwise you would not be here on this forum discussing this issues. The universe only appears to be "fine-tuned" for our existance because we are the product of the universe ourselves. If the universe was different, but was able to produce some other forms of life different from ours, those creatures would be wondering the same thing "wow this universe is so fine-tuned for life!".Edited by Nutcase, : No reason given.Edited by Nutcase, : No reason given.

If you'd manage to pull it off, Aquinas will turn in his grave sideways.

Just a heads up, Aquinas's Five Proves For Gods existance (which were written in 1200s) do not make sence in 21 century / can be refuted by science easily.^Just incase you didn't manage to catch up with the past 500 years of scientific research. Edited by Nutcase, : No reason given.

Why would I mention the proofs if I am not familiar with them? Of course I read them.
The only reason Aquinas called them "proofs" was because they were unrefutble during his time. Since Middle Ages, science advanced far enough to disprove / put in question the premises Aquinas used. You have to be pretty uninformed or ignorant if you think that his 800-year-old arguments, which are based on empirical knowledge, are still valid.
Just out of curiosity. If you support his philosophy, do you believe in king's divine right? Edited by Nutcase, : No reason given.Edited by Nutcase, : No reason given.