Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,928 Year: 4,185/9,624 Month: 1,056/974 Week: 15/368 Day: 15/11 Hour: 3/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Is US Establishing An Islamic Theocracy In Iraq?
randman 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4930 days)
Posts: 6367
Joined: 05-26-2005


Message 14 of 58 (275215)
01-03-2006 1:04 AM
Reply to: Message 13 by Buzsaw
01-03-2006 12:30 AM


Re: Islamofascism And Democracy
Buz as a fellow believer, I caution you to be careful with prophecy. Yes, there are some "negative" prophecies about the end-times, that are true, but there are others as well.
The Bible also states a great catastrophe will descend on Egypt drying up the Nile, and then Egypt will turn to the Lord, and there will be a godly peace as a result as Egypt and Syria are called "My people" or something like that, and a highway between Egypt, Israel and Syria.
That has not happened. It can only happen now if Egypt and Syria turn to Jesus and are converted to following Christ to a degree as soceities. It's unfulfilled prophecies of great revival in these nations, and so this, imo, must occur before any of anti-Christ scenarios play out.
In Iraq, is Bush unwittingly perhaps backing a new Islamic regime?
probably

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by Buzsaw, posted 01-03-2006 12:30 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
randman 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4930 days)
Posts: 6367
Joined: 05-26-2005


Message 18 of 58 (275331)
01-03-2006 12:16 PM
Reply to: Message 17 by jar
01-03-2006 11:50 AM


Re: Iran won the Gulf War POTM?
China already had plenty of nukes prior to Bush. In fact, Clinton helped them modernize their missile delivery system. Before he ordered transfers by Executive Orders, they could not hit the broad-side of a barn so to speak.
Pakistan and India had already developed nukes as well, prior to Bush.
So all this talk about accelerating nuclear development is bogus. Certainly, Bush stopped Pakistan's nuclear program cold. I don't know what India is doing, but Ghadaffy stopped his nuclear program as Bush showed he was willing to invade nations if necessary to stop such programs.
Iran was already developing nukes prior to Bush, and probably if he had more support, he would force Iran to capitulate like he did with Ghaddafy.
I really think your blaming Bush here is quite absurd.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by jar, posted 01-03-2006 11:50 AM jar has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 20 by joshua221, posted 01-03-2006 4:58 PM randman has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024