And yet, I remember one sermon in which the congregration's president raised the question of how far our tolerance can be allowed to go. Could we tolerate some other denomination's intolerance?
But, yes, there is no dogma. I mean, if you don't have to stop and think about it at any time, then what good is it?
I think this comes meanly out of the anti-establishmentarialism 60's subculture days, but the phrase strongly associated with UUs is "To Question is the Answer". And yet that is a very powerful statement about theology, isn't it? If you only accept a dogma without questioning it, without thinking about it, then you really haven't accepted it, since you haven't even thought about it. You
have to have thought about your theology, your dogma, in order to really belive it, right?
At the same time, there's an adult RE program that I encountered: "Building Your Own Theology". When I discussed this with a fundamentalist co-worker (who's admittedly a bit more free-thinking than most would dare to be_, he did admit that we do indeed create our own theologies. Let's face it: a fundie will hear his denomination's theology presented to him, but is it really that theology that he adopts? No, it's his own particular misunderstanding of that theology, just as it was his teacher's own personal misunderstanding that formed the basis of that misunderstanding, and so on for countless generations.