Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,907 Year: 4,164/9,624 Month: 1,035/974 Week: 362/286 Day: 5/13 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Congress goes off the deep end
ThingsChange
Member (Idle past 5956 days)
Posts: 315
From: Houston, Tejas (Mexican Colony)
Joined: 02-04-2004


Message 18 of 126 (353740)
10-02-2006 8:34 PM
Reply to: Message 13 by Silent H
10-01-2006 6:06 AM


liberal distortion as usual
You guys never cease to amaze me. You make it sound like wire-tapping gone wild.
article in OP writes:
...wiretapping of calls and e-mails between people on U.S. soil making calls or sending e-mails and those in other countries...
Under the measure, the president would be authorized to conduct such wiretaps if he:
” Notifies the House and Senate intelligence committees and congressional leaders.
” Believes an attack is imminent and later explains the reason and names the individuals and groups involved.
” Renews his certification every 90 days.
So, it's for international calls, others are notified, and reasons are given. I don't see a problem with that, and I am not a Bush-supporter (mainly because of illegal immigration and spiraling debt).
In Defense of Congress: The first priority of government is to protect the people. Similar security emphasis over some rights has occurred for other wars, and like those, the temporary measures will be retracted when the war is over (i.e. in 72.327992 yrs). You may not feel that there is a threat from radical Islam, and a war, but a significant portion of USA does.
When I vote Republican, it's because the Democrats offer a worse choice.

'Liberalism is a mental disorder' - Michael Savage

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by Silent H, posted 10-01-2006 6:06 AM Silent H has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 19 by kuresu, posted 10-02-2006 8:47 PM ThingsChange has not replied
 Message 20 by jar, posted 10-02-2006 8:50 PM ThingsChange has not replied
 Message 23 by crashfrog, posted 10-02-2006 10:02 PM ThingsChange has not replied
 Message 31 by Silent H, posted 10-03-2006 5:36 AM ThingsChange has not replied

  
ThingsChange
Member (Idle past 5956 days)
Posts: 315
From: Houston, Tejas (Mexican Colony)
Joined: 02-04-2004


Message 108 of 126 (354910)
10-06-2006 8:27 PM
Reply to: Message 106 by nator
10-06-2006 6:38 PM


I hope the FBI is listening to some that I know
Everyday, in our business, we have frequent overseas calls to foreigners in oil-producing countries. I have no doubt that the FBI listens in to some of these, and quite frankly, I am glad they do, as I will explain.
It's not the deal-makers that I worry about. I get to know them, and they are more interested business. However, my concern is with their cadre of people that travel with them when they visit, and make phone calls here to make arrangements. Plus, some of them have drivers that just look suspicious. They have access to money, shipping, and their countrymen here. In some cases, the ability of getting a warrant would take longer than the frequently-changing people and communication channels. These folks could and probably are all above board, but I would rather be on the safe side.
The key thing in my message is that on paper, the theory sounds good, but if you actually deal with some of these people, your guard goes up.

'Liberalism is a mental disorder' - Michael Savage

This message is a reply to:
 Message 106 by nator, posted 10-06-2006 6:38 PM nator has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 112 by Chiroptera, posted 10-07-2006 6:00 PM ThingsChange has not replied
 Message 124 by RAZD, posted 10-08-2006 5:46 PM ThingsChange has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024