|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Did the Flood really happen? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 199 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
Facts, evidence and reason. Give them a try.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 199 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
Facts, evidence and reason. Give them a try.
See Message 240 "Vexed Problem" above. I thlnk I have more to address. No facts, evidence and reason in the referenced message. Just an acknowledgement of your lack of evidence. Edited by JonF, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 199 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
Quite the Gish Gallop of PRATTS there.
Flumes are not simulations of open water floods. Edited by JonF, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 199 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
But the idea should be pretty clear: the standard explanation of the geo column with its fossils violates any reasonable physical explanation, and I've said why many times.
No, you've said so many times. "Why" would mean addressing proffered physical explanations and detailing the fundamental principle(s) and analysis that invalidate those proffered physical explanations. We all know you are incapable of that for several reasons. Edited by JonF, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 199 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
Thanks. I haven't seen that for years.
http://www.csun.edu/~vcgeo005/Flood%2520geology.pdf
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 199 days) Posts: 6174 Joined:
|
Her choice of the word "pondered" rather than any active verb is interesting. To me it strongly implies sitting at home making stuff up.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 199 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
No, but that isn't the particular topic I'm addressing here. I'm merely talking about how I came to my view of the geological column by thlnking about it without any Biblical input, and that really is true
I believe you. Sitting in your chair making stuff up without any reference to the real world or physical limitations. Edited by JonF, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 199 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
I'm trying to prove the Flood.
You should be trying to find out what happened.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 199 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
as usual I would thlnk it intuitively obvious
WHich is an admission that you have no evidence, you just made it up.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 199 days) Posts: 6174 Joined:
|
It's nice of you to admit your claims are solely Biblically based and do not have anything to do with reality.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 199 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
As you said, your "explanations" are the result of pondering. The fact that you've made less than an infinitesimal number of observations and the fact that so many of them are physically impossible (e.g. picking up ent formations and gently depositing them elsewhere) confirm that your only sources are the Bible and your ignorant fantasies.
Not the real world.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 199 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
. IN ANY CASE the fact that fossilization is rare under normal circumstances is far from accounting for what is actually there
Based on what analysis? Show your logic and calculations.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 199 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
Also, most discussions of dating take into account that their year was 360 days long, they added in "leap" time now and then just as we do, and they had a lunar calendar etc
Gibberish. You are confusing what is measured with the arbitrary units we use to quantify the measurements. We describe the age in units of today's years. It doesn't matter what units they used; maybe they used the time between cricket chirps as their base, or the time it took to walk from Jerusalem to Australia. No matter what units you use the Earth is 75,000 times older than you think it is.
I don't know of any system that can legitimately get anywhere near millions of years.
That's because you know nothing of the systems we use.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 199 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
Yes.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 199 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
We know the reactions and how fast they proceed under various circumstances. The laws of physics haven't changed so it is a simple calculation.
When doesn't matter much. Just that there is pressure. Temperature is more important than pressure. Temperature high enough to speed up the process significantly produces a different result, so we can tell
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024