quote:
We observe populations that once could interbreed - were once even the same population - stop being able to interbreed as a result of accumulating change through mutation. It's called "speciation". How can you talk about "created kinds" if new "kinds" - under your proposed definition - arise all the time through observed processes?
Crashfrog, you yourself have actually observed all of this speciation occuring? Gee, are you sure you aren't relying upon authority at all for that claim? In fact, you even say "we"...who is this "we" you are referring to???? Surely not any competent authorities in the field.
**********************************
PS: To try to head off at least one of Crashfrog's predictable childish counters, I am
absolutely not claiming that species don't arise in nature frequently by reproductive isolation; just that
Crashfrog is relying upon authority when making that statement, despite his/her arguments against doing such in a another thread.
[This message has been edited by DNAunion, 12-27-2003]