Read the first sentence, I said elucidate a plausible chain of events.
I showed you a plausible chain of events. That it is plausible is demonstrated by the fact that we can see an organism that actually displays each step along the way.
Now, just posting a bunch of photos of a shallow eye, and then a deeper eye, and then suddenly a liquid filled eye, is not even closer to actually contemplating the problem, or explaining a chain of events that makes sense.
Rather than resorting to trite insults, perhaps you could explain exactly what it is that you are looking for, if not the steps that it took to get to a novel biological feature.
Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. -- Thomas Jefferson
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat
It has always struck me as odd that fundies devote so much time and effort into trying to find a naturalistic explanation for their mythical flood, while looking for magical explanations for things that actually happened. -- Dr. Adequate
Howling about evidence is a conversation stopper, and it never stops to think if the claim could possibly be true -- foreveryoung