~2 writes:
Hi Panda, Separating the eye from the body as you know renders it inoperable. It is built to operate as a contiguous unit and therefore your argument is empty imo.
So, your argument is that a human is better than a camera?
Well, that is nice goal-post moving.
But going back to the comparison we were making: a camera is better than an eye.
To answer your 'adjusted' comparison: a camera used by a human is better than an eye used by a human.
You have decided that an eye connected to a living human brain is analogous to a camera, but that is not correct.
It is a False Analogy.
~2 writes:
I can just as easily turn your own statement around and say take a SLR lense from its body and see what it can do.
An eye is
not equivalent to the lens in a camera.
An eye is equivalent to the whole camera.
An eye connected to a human is
not equivalent to a camera.
An eye connected to a human is equivalent to a camera connected to a human.
Edited by Panda, : No reason given.
Edited by Panda, : No reason given.
If I were you
And I wish that I were you
All the things I'd do
To make myself turn blue