I guess I'm the one trick pony here, but this is yet another illustration of some of the reasons I won't engage in debates with Buzsaw.
The exact point at issue in "Dating Walls" was discussed in a thread started by Buzsaw himself just a few months ago. See
Dating Question For Members. While Buz did make noises about understanding the discussion, it was evident that he had learned absolutely nothing.
And here he is barely six months later insisting that Moose respond to his ridiculous reused bricks analogy as if that previous discussion had never happened. Grrrr!!!
Of course if he ever finally gets it, he's going to pretend that he always understood, and that we just hadn't considered the tsunami. (Now would be the time to go for that jeer button, Mr. Saw)
Buzsaw knows that dating methods cannot be right because of the Architect Principle (i.e. if something disagrees with the Bible, it is wrong). But Buzsaw's understanding of science together with your finger tip would barely fill a thimble. So you get threads like this one every time dating (or any other scientific methodology) is at issue.
I fully believe that Buzsaw should be reinstated into the Science forums, but his posts in that Great Debate illustrate why he was booted in the first place.
Edited by NoNukes, : No reason given.
Edited by NoNukes, : with apologizes for spelling Moose incorrectly