purpledawn writes:
Not necessarily. If that were true, then there wouldn't be or have been any disagreements amongst those inspired to write, speak, or teach.
Whether there are or aren't disagreement is a matter of interpretation. I was more interested in how an inspired person could be speaking other than God's opinion - in the technical, how-could-this-be sense rather than depending on interpretation to simply state so.
IF there was indeed disagreement (which is quite a different thing to an interpretation concluding so) AND the various parties were inspired in what they said THEN God would appear to be giving contradictory messages.
Else they weren't inspired in the bits where they disagree.
Which is it (if not some other possibility)?
Edited by iano, : No reason given.
Edited by iano, : No reason given.