Peanut Gallery

I'm confused, I thought RAZD made it clear that his discussion about subjective evidence has nothing to do with deities. Wasn't that the purpose of the News Flash that even you yourself quoted?NEWS FLASH: Am I missing something here? Is RAZD telepathically communicating something to you without us, or even himself, being aware of it? If not, what makes you think his 'subjective evidence' talk has anything to do with 'deities'?It's been made pretty clear that it doesn't.Jon

---

Check out No webpage found at provided URL: Apollo's Temple!
Ignorance is temporary; you should be able to overcome it. - nwr

Sorry, but statistics and probability are only meant to describe reality; they do not define it.What is probable or what is more likely has little bearing on what actually is.Jon

---

Check out No webpage found at provided URL: Apollo's Temple!
Ignorance is temporary; you should be able to overcome it. - nwr

What does their current discussion have to do with whether or not RAZDs comments on 'subjective evidence' were meant to relate to 'deities'?Jon

---

Check out No webpage found at provided URL: Apollo's Temple!
Ignorance is temporary; you should be able to overcome it. - nwr

Isn't this just another way to say: "we have desk" and "we have no evidence of pen"? By combining it all into a single statement, 'evidence of the desk unblocked by a pen', you're just secretly slipping in an 'absence of evidence' claim.No one disagrees that the desk exists. How does mentioning its existence change matters any? Aren't you still left with what you had before, a desk with no evidence of a pen?Jon

---

Check out No webpage found at provided URL: Apollo's Temple!
Ignorance is temporary; you should be able to overcome it. - nwr

Luckily for Straggler he decided to challenge one of the newer fundie believers instead of one of the more long-standing and rational theists.I suppose it's always easier to pick on the new guy than to actually fight it out with someone your own size.JonEdited by Jon, : No reason given.

---

Love your enemies!

Hopefully Chuck will learn something from all of this. Yes; the little guy is always eager to prove himself. It's up to the bigger man to turn him down. Like I said above. No thanks.Jon

---

Love your enemies!