holmes writes:
Rrhain just this week has convinced me that all references to homosexuality in the Bible, are specified to acts with male prostitutes. I knew some were, but not that all were.
Zealot writes:
I'd love to hear Rrhain's argument for that. I dont think it holds any ground though.
I believe Rrhain was probably talking about the translation of one of Paul's letters (Romans I think). In fact, it can be translated to say male prostitiution instead of homosexuality in general, if I'm not mistaken.
As to the main topic, I have changed my mind about some things. When I first heard some of the creationist arguements ((e.g., polonium halos, decaying orbits) I thought they had some clout until I started reading the refutations. It became clear that some creationists were not after the truth but instead were using smoke and mirrors to confuse the truth. For me, science can only claim what the evidence supports. This is not what I see with creationism.
Before reading this site and others I thought there was honesty on both sides. Due to the dishonest acts of some, not all, creation scientists this belief is quickly dwindling.
™ Version 4.2
