Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,924 Year: 4,181/9,624 Month: 1,052/974 Week: 11/368 Day: 11/11 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Evolution - small to big?
PaulK
Member
Posts: 17828
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.5


Message 4 of 40 (53537)
09-02-2003 6:02 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by hoju
09-02-2003 5:45 PM


Evolution doesn't HAVE to always go from small to large or large to small. It will go with whatever is most advantageous at the time of that particular population.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by hoju, posted 09-02-2003 5:45 PM hoju has not replied

  
PaulK
Member
Posts: 17828
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.5


Message 10 of 40 (54158)
09-06-2003 6:49 AM
Reply to: Message 9 by Minnemooseus
09-06-2003 5:02 AM


Wouldn't that depend on whether the original idea was based on evolution or the idea that higher oxygen levels would in themselves cause animals to grow larger ? Crashfrog's idea is a perfectly sensible test of the latter idea.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by Minnemooseus, posted 09-06-2003 5:02 AM Minnemooseus has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 11 by John, posted 09-06-2003 11:11 AM PaulK has not replied
 Message 12 by Minnemooseus, posted 09-06-2003 1:43 PM PaulK has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024