Brad McFall writes:
Stop beating around the terebith book and accept me for who I really am.
I would if I understood what you're on about.
Brad McFall writes:
I am not GOD.
Of course not. You exist.
Brad McFall writes:
your ears are closed to the truth and that is just what I said so you have no excuse. Perhaps your lens are too heavy.
I'm sorry, I don't hear too well through my lenses.
Brad McFall writes:
I know how to use the following:
Biblical Creationism
Scientific Creationsim
Creation Science
and I did ON AIR, Live with CAll ins. Try being a fair producer no matter which camera the director TAKES and you will soon realize that this is language that will remain the the public square no matter that marxist ethics is MORE controversial and a worse offendor of lingo extrodinar.
Well, if it's a matter of who talks funniest, then I guess you might be right.
Brad McFall writes:
I HAD a Chrisitan upbringing thta allowed me a larger veiw of biology than was ALLLOWED at cornell.
Didn't do your spelling much good, though.
Brad McFall writes:
It had nothing to do with religon it had to do with Marxist PERCEPTION. Perception as your post noted is ONLY 1/2 of the reality.
Sometimes, as in your case, perception has no relation with reality whatsoever.
Brad McFall writes:
If you learn to READ creation literature as I was helped out by the book beyond the Day (see BookNook) you will find that such is not offensive to seculars only they have not actually been taught to READ it.
Am I to understand that 'READING' is something else then 'reading'? It sounds very profound and all, but I suspect it just comes down to interpreting creation literature. I've seen it before and it doesn't impress me in the least.
Brad McFall writes:
One letter at atime my friend.
Takes too long, 'my friend'.
Brad McFall writes:
Intelligent Design refers to GOD like it or not.
Of course it does, we all know that. It's just that there is no Intelligent Design.
Brad,
I just came up with another possibility:
- Brad McFall is rambling incoherently