THE END OF EVOLUTION?

I have very little understanding of the cell. Biological scientists don't understand the cell either, yet, they are still doing good work.This is how I see it. We are talking about one of the most complex organizational structures in the known universe; the others being related.
First of all we need a language A. A must have an originator or a generator, A doesn't exist otherwise. We then need a transmitter, which is the natural laws. Entropy is a factor in the natural world so we need a receive the message with all its warts.We're dead, unless the code that is transmitted has inbuilt error correction.Inbuilt error correction is not random arrangement.Edited by LucyTheApe, : No reason given.

---

There no doubt exist natural laws, but once this fine reason of ours was corrupted, it corrupted everything. blz paskal

Percy you can't get information from nothing.Edited by LucyTheApe, : No reason given.

---

There no doubt exist natural laws, but once this fine reason of ours was corrupted, it corrupted everything. blz paskal

We do have people from 10000 years ago or 6000 years anyway, us, our cells have been copying themselves, just like the chimpanzees and the pandas, the wolves and any other kind of animal.

---

There no doubt exist natural laws, but once this fine reason of ours was corrupted, it corrupted everything. blz paskal

I assume by the E word you mean Entropy. Inescapable, sure, that's what makes the cell such a miraculous instrument, it has inbuilt knowledge of what it has to do.

---

There no doubt exist natural laws, but once this fine reason of ours was corrupted, it corrupted everything. blz paskal

A salamander is a salamander, not a bear. I didn't misunderstand what you said; I just disagree, life is continuous.You seem to make a claim that I don't understand 2Ltd. Edited by LucyTheApe, : No reason given.Edited by LucyTheApe, : No reason given.

---

There no doubt exist natural laws, but once this fine reason of ours was corrupted, it corrupted everything. blz paskal

Your message 150 was confusing. You're getting data mixed up with information. Maybe googles of information are being produced every day, but only by the creative forces of human intelligence.Was it helpful? It didn't make sense! My point is that the term 'species' is arbitrary. It doesn't matter how selective a system is, it doesn't change a cow into a whale.

---

There no doubt exist natural laws, but once this fine reason of ours was corrupted, it corrupted everything. blz paskal

The sun reveals itself, intelligent humans create information!

---

There no doubt exist natural laws, but once this fine reason of ours was corrupted, it corrupted everything. blz paskal

Intelligent humans interpret data.

---

There no doubt exist natural laws, but once this fine reason of ours was corrupted, it corrupted everything. blz paskal

Anything is possible in the land of fairytales.Bones in the dirt indicate that organisms were quickly covered with mud before they could decompose, that's all, anything else is fantasy.

---

There no doubt exist natural laws, but once this fine reason of ours was corrupted, it corrupted everything. blz paskal

Data and information are not synonymous.You keep referring me back to Shannon. Shannon's work dealt with systems of message transmission already in place. With a language and alphabet already established. That is, a message is generated, coded and sent, data is received and converted back into the message, in this sense the data is information, it is preconceived, ordered and intentional.To gather data from the sun, document it and write a book about it is the process of creating information. Whether the information makes sense or draws correct conclusions is irrelevant. The sun doesn't send a preconceived message, we draw conclusions from our observations.If you want to talk about Shannon's information in regards to DNA, then you have to assume an information source, a coder and a decoder, non of which matter alone can produce.

---

There no doubt exist natural laws, but once this fine reason of ours was corrupted, it corrupted everything. blz paskal

Are you saying that an inanimate object, has developed the ability to use Boolean logic?Information requires intelligence, tell me how I am wrong, please.

---

There no doubt exist natural laws, but once this fine reason of ours was corrupted, it corrupted everything. blz paskal

Meaning is mathematically unquantifiable. You don't need meaning when dealing with the engineering problems of message transfer, as Shannon was. Information is what intelligent beings use to communicate meaning. Percy, I think it is you who doesn't understand the facts of information, not me.

---

There no doubt exist natural laws, but once this fine reason of ours was corrupted, it corrupted everything. blz paskal

My claim goes much further than what you're saying here Percy, my claim is that the cell has knowledge, it knows what it is and what it has to do. The information content (or lack of the effect of the 2nd law) of a DNA strand tells us that life is not chance.A cell has to replicate through time and space, with no recall, it can't go back and try again.This whole system is an intelligent communications construct.

---

There no doubt exist natural laws, but once this fine reason of ours was corrupted, it corrupted everything. blz paskal

This has turned into a very interesting debate.I tried to move away from 2LTD.But it persists.Today is less ordered than yesterday.Yesterday is less ordered than the day before.Where did the order come from?

---

There no doubt exist natural laws, but once this fine reason of ours was corrupted, it corrupted everything. blz paskal

Which messages do you want me to respond to Percy? Please be specific.

---

There no doubt exist natural laws, but once this fine reason of ours was corrupted, it corrupted everything. blz paskal