About the voluminous evidence for macro-evolution, that is a whole nuther topic on its own I guess. On that note, what would you define as substantiated fact when it comes to macro-evolution?
If you want to stay on topic show us the
mechanism that prevents one genus, say the ancient primate ancestor, from evolving into all of the subsequent genera of ape (i.e., orangutans, gorillas, chimpanzees, and humans).
But to do this, you first have to counter all of genetics, supported by paleontology, as those fields show that the ancient primate ancestor did evolve into those more recent genera. Then you have to show the mechanism that prevented that evolution.
And please, I've had a long day. Stick to science. Leave the religious belief and creation "science" for another day, eh?
Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.