Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,914 Year: 4,171/9,624 Month: 1,042/974 Week: 1/368 Day: 1/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Have 600,000 Iraqis died violently since 2003?
Modulous
Member
Posts: 7801
From: Manchester, UK
Joined: 05-01-2005


Message 75 of 77 (448151)
01-12-2008 9:39 AM
Reply to: Message 73 by Tusko
01-11-2008 11:55 AM


Re: Finally, the Lancet slain once and for all...
I think one of the comments makes a good point:
While most of Munro's points do in fact seem to be complete crap, the point about funding from Soros is reasonable (if for example, the study had found the opposite and had been funded by some right wing billionaire I suspect we'd all be quick to all that out)
That said, I'm probably erring on the side of the WHO at this point.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 73 by Tusko, posted 01-11-2008 11:55 AM Tusko has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 76 by Tal, posted 01-13-2008 2:33 AM Modulous has replied

  
Modulous
Member
Posts: 7801
From: Manchester, UK
Joined: 05-01-2005


Message 77 of 77 (448376)
01-13-2008 8:08 AM
Reply to: Message 76 by Tal
01-13-2008 2:33 AM


Re: Finally, the Lancet slain once and for all...
Ahhh but the plot thickens!
Usually when the plot thickens, it means some new and interesting information has come to light. I know that Soros funded the study, that was why I posted that "the point about funding from Soros is reasonable". The point in question was from the article posted which states
quote:
Soros's group gave $46,000, and the Samuel Rubin Foundation gave $5,000. An anonymous donor, and another donor whose identity he does not know, provided the balance, Tirman said. The Lancet II study cost about $100,000, according to Tirman, including about $45,000 for publicity and travel. That means that nearly half of the study's funding came from an outspoken billionaire who has repeatedly criticized the Iraq campaign and who spent $30 million trying to defeat Bush in 2004.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 76 by Tal, posted 01-13-2008 2:33 AM Tal has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024