NJ in reply to Crash writes:
It's not so surprising that he offers no evidence besides "I'm important; you should trust me. Besides I totally talked to some guys and read some papers."
Who says he hasn't? This is from a news source, however, they did provide a link to ICECAP.
I say he hasn't cited any evidence, NJ. He offered no evidence.
A link to a right-wing, "individual investor" (just try to find out who those folks are) funded web site is not evidence.
"I read dozens of scientific papers" is a pathetic citation, don't you think? Of course, maybe I missed the evidence he cited--could you point some out?
He's a TV weatherman, specializing in describing local weather patterns (in San Diego!) on the scale of a few days to a week. He founded The Weather Channel in 1983 and ran it for one year before the investors took it away.
Being a weatherman is a fine profession, I'm sure--but depending on one for climate science is like having eye surgery performed by an optometrist.
Sadly, his primary claim to fame will now be as a nut job. Did
you read his rant?
Dastardly scientists are on the take?
A TV weatherman says we can ignore the consensus of thousands of scientists
because they're all being paid off, and you think that is a rational, scientific refutation of global warming?
Hoo boy. Get out the foil caps, folks.
Real things always push back.-William James
Save lives! Click here!Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC!---------------------------------------