Is it my imagination or is there a complete lack of response from creationists at this site? I was of the understanding that "transitional" fossils, which represent transition between species, would constitute evidence of past macroevolution and therefore are inconsistent with creationism.
Is such hard evidence which contradicts creationism to go unchallenged? Ot is the theory of creationism in the process of undergoing some radical evolution to account for such evidence?