LA writes:
Ken Ham can believe what he wants and state what he wants. However, when he tries to tell my grandchildren that his version of the history of life on this earth is the truth, he better have more to back him up than speculation hinged on an old manuscript. The burden of proof must be higher when imparting knowledge to those who will accept it easily. From my point of view, to present yourself as an authority, and then provide to children unsupported conclusions as fact, is fraud. Worse still, it is a form of child abuse.
Hi LA. He can only tell the grandchildren if you or your children are so careless as to let them go where you don't want them. That's your perrogative as guardian. If the kiddies are abused it's because you or their parents allowed them to be if you feel that strongly about the site.
Btw, by the same token, was Piltdown Man 30 years of child abuse, over two generations of kiddies in school being fed the Piltdown deception? We Biblical creationists think it's child abuse to forbid children in school both sides of the origins issues et al, forcing them into belief of evolution and whatever comes up the pike via secularist agendas. Unlike Ham's museum, they don't have a choice and they must endure the abuse throughout their education if they are in the public school system.
BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW
™ Version 4.2