Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Degrees of Faith?
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 1182 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 57 of 86 (389311)
03-12-2007 3:53 PM


PRESENCE totally exempts the need of believing
Hello,
These are the two degrees of faith [reliance on trust or belief]:
In the first degree one reposes his mind upon what is deemed sufficient support or understanding. [first blind].
In the second degree he utilizes that reliance to become the begetter of his own beliefs, which will lead a second blind until both fall off the stairway.
There are solid supporting evidences proving that in all the places of the New Testament in Ancient Roman Language, the word FIDELIS [i.e. Fidelity/Loyalty] as originally written,
has been gradually substituted with the words 'fide' and 'fides' [i.e. faith] in the beginning of the centuries, as well as in the authorized versions of the New Testament in Greek and other languages.
THE SEPARATING ABYSS
While subjecting him/herself under religion or a spiritually imposed doctrine, one tends to not see the difference between the two:
UPDATED definition of FIDELITY - A constant Loyalty; Permanent consistency on remaining true and loyal.
UPDATED definition of faith - Reliance on trust or belief; religious faith; ecstasy of the mind; an uplifting feeling of reliance which exempts the need of total SURENESS [plain understanding of the things and clarification of the facts].
If faith was a type of reliance denoting confidence or intimacy as in a confidential approach, then how can that confidential intimacy be true while the fact itself of having faith exempts the need of applying ALL one's UNDERSTANDING?? For the instruction remains the same:
'Love Jehaveh of the Hosts with all thy strength and with ALL thy UNDERSTANDING[plain comprehension of the things and clarification of the facts]' and 'You shall KNOW/comprehend the Truth and that KNOWLEDGE/comprehension on Who the Truth IS shall set you free'.
and it does not say '..with all thy belief' nor that the belief on the truth will set you free.
There is a separating abyss that differentiates faith from FIDELITY[constant Loyalty];
For it is possible to have faith [reliance on trust or belief] in many things or beings at one time,
while FIDELITY [constant Loyalty] only exists if it is kept to an only one. That is Loyalty/Fidelity: You can not vote in more than one candidate at one time.
Also, it is possible to keep Fidelity that is founded in total SURENESS
[knowledge/comprehension of the proofs and understanding of the facts]
but if it is faith [reliance on trust or belief], then the faith itself exempts the need of applying ALL one's UNDERSTANDING [DEDUCTIVE reasoning of the things and comprehension of the facts].
UPDATED definition of believe - 1st. - to credit or to accept as true the things as they are presented, which means by circumstances other than total SURENESS [understanding of the proofs and comprehension/knowledge of the facts].
2nd. - to be persuaded that truth is accessible by circumstances other than total SURENESS [understanding of the proofs and comprehension/knowledge of the facts].
THE POSTMAN
In the Scriptures as originally written, even in the first manuscripts of the New Testament, all those who were healed were asked the question: ”will you keep FIDELITY to Jehaveh?’ as well as ”will you HOPE only in Jehaveh?’,
but in the versions that proceeded from the spiritual ministry of the beast[spiritual ordination] the question as originally written has been substituted with ”do you believe..?’
For the postman does not show up saying: ”do you believe that I’m the postman?’; nor do you respond to him saying: ”help my unbelief!’
When you see the postman, you do not have to believe whether or not he is the postman. You simply *know he is one because you know first what a postman is sent for.
So is when you see the eternal living Word that became flesh, you do recognize he is true because you recognize his words are not of him, but of the One who has sent him. For it is attested that there is a way [other than believing] for you to know whether he is of Elohim or [that] he speaks of himself. A way through first retaining/keeping the word from the One Who has sent him, and it does not have any involvement with believing, as it is said:
My words are not mine, but [that] of the One that has sent me. If any one desire to practise the Eternal’s will, he shall *know by the same [written] instruction, whether it is of Elohim, or [that] I speak from myself. He that speaks from himself seeks his own glory; but he that seeks the glory of him that has sent him, he is true, and unrighteousness is not in him.
A true postman does not waste time speculating if you believe he is the postman or not. You do recognize he is the postman because he simply does what he came to do. So is every eternal word that comes out of Jehaveh, including the Living Word that became flesh.
The proposal of the Word that became flesh is to be KEPT, to be RETAINED by you; to REMAIN eternally with you; as it is said: ”If you love me you shall KEEP my word’. The true keeping/RETAINING of every eternal word is only possible through UNDERSTANDING, knowledge/comprehension on what that word or instruction means, and it does not have any involvement with belief.
Paraphrased scripture: ”Everything is possible to him that keeps total FIDELITY to Jehaveh’
What proceeded from bestiae obscurae[spiritually imposed doctrine]:
'...everything is possible to him that believes'.
In the Scriptures as originally written it does not say that ”Abraham had a belief in...' nor that ”he had a faith in...'
but that 'Abraham HOPED in...' and that 'Abraham KEPT FIDELITY to...'.
THE MUSTARD SEED. Fidelity is the permanent consistency on remaining true and loyal, which is only possible through KEEPING/remaining eternally and HOPING.
The ends do not justify the means,
and Fidelity is a direct expression of the means through which it is possible to REMAIN:
1st. - permanently/constantly/eternally
2nd. - consistently
3rd. - being true and loyal
The mustard seed is also a solid evidence proving that the word FIDELIS [i.e. Fidelity/Loyalty] as originally written has been substituted with the words 'fide' and 'fides' [i.e. faith] in the versions of the New Testament.
The size of the seed determines how long it will remain on the earth without being consumed by the birds. In no way it will be consumed. For there is no bird bill that could grasp the smallest seed.
Is it faith or FIDELITY? Which word is directly related to mustard seed's duration/permanence time, if not the one that requires time to remain PERMANENTLY/CONSTANTLY LOYAL?
For the parable indicates that the mustard seed itself is directly related to its permanence/duration without being consumed.
Paraphrased scripture: ”If you KEEP a FIDELITY [to Jehaveh] that endures[remains] like a mustard seed...’.
What proceeded from bestiae obscurae [spiritually imposed doctrine]:
'...if you have a faith like a mustard seed...'.
-
PRESENCE totally exempts the need of believing (of having faith) and it can be seen in the words that were spoken to the Samaritan woman:
”You worship what you *KNOW NOT’, which means ”You worship what you believe’.
We worship what we know because the Eternal’s PRESENCE is manifest in the sight of the Hebrews.
When something or someone is present, it is not necessary to believe (to have faith), because you ASCERTAIN. And who ascertains *KNOWS, does not believe.
Therefore, a present Eternal Celestial exempts the faith. For if there is the Eternal Being present, you ascertain that PRESENCE, and therefore, you KNOW that the Eternal Celestial exists, and it does not have any involvement regarding believing.
To make one believe is the strongest ability of the deceiver. For the believer uses the heart alone, which exempts total SURENESS[to love with all the understanding].
When Legion [the demon; father of the beliefs] speaks the lie, ”it’ speaks out of its own nature, for ”it’ is a liar to **itself by believing what ”it’ believes to be truth; ”it’ is the father of the beliefs and does not *KNOW what truth is.
**does not see its beliefs as lies; just like whoever becomes a liar to him/herself by believing what he/she believes to be truth and becomes the begetter of his/her own belief/lie.
This is the purpose of a false elohim: To make one believe and then leave the brain at the door, for no ascertaining is required when all one needs is to believe.
When a man loves the Eternal Celestial with ALL his understanding [which requires knowledge of the Truth and clarification for total SURENESS], then does the presentation of irrefutable, touchable and undeniable proofs anihilate the need for believe?
While inviting Thomas to touch His hands and His side, did the Lamb anihilate Thomas' need for believe?
Paraphrased scripture:
'Come! Place your finger in the prints of my hands and touch my side, and do NOT be a man of credo/belief, but of SURENESS!'
What proceeded from bestiae obscurae [spiritually imposed doctrine]:
'...doubt no longer, but believe'.
.
Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : ...came to do, instead of ...came for
Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : remains
Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : has been
Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : We worship what we know because the Eternal’s PRESENCE is manifest in the sight to the Hebrews.
Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : of

Replies to this message:
 Message 58 by macaroniandcheese, posted 03-12-2007 8:29 PM goldenlightArchangel has replied

  
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 1182 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 59 of 86 (389614)
03-14-2007 3:33 PM


THE ROMAN CENTURION’s Fidelity anihilates the need of believing
-
View it; two things that do not match: The ”need of believing(having faith)’, as the imposed doctrines of the earth intend to promote, and Words that are to be kept IMMEDIATELY.
The purpose of the word is to be KEPT and retained, and if the word is to be KEPT IMMEDIATELY (without the need of believing) that only could be possible through FIDELITY/constant Loyalty, as mentioned by the Roman Centurion:
For I also am a man under command, with soldiers under me; and I say to this one, 'Go!' and he goes, and to another, 'Come!' and he comes, and to my slave, 'Do this!' and he does it.
When the word is to be IMMEDIATELY RECEIVED and KEPT/retained, a true commander does not waste time telling others that they must believe(have faith) in the words he is saying, also if someone truly knows about the PRESENCE of the One that has sent him, he receives and keep those same words in an immediate time, without the need of believing(having faith).
For he knows that ”IMMEDIATELY’ means that one does not have time to believe neither hesitate, not even return his way to ask for help for his unbelief.
-
In the paraphrased text, view the actual words that were spoken to Thomas and the apostles:
Blessed are those who *did not see and even so **RETAINED the words.
-
**RECEIVED/KEPT the words; which means, Blessed are those who did not see and even so did not need to appeal to belief in order to retain the word.
* did not see and even so...; Like everything that is done through true loyalty/fidelity only, without having the need of believing(having faith), as highlighted by the Roman centurion. For the purpose of every word that comes out of Jehaveh of the Hosts, including the Living Word that became flesh, is to be KEPT IMMEDIATELY, which leaves no room for any proposed need of believing.
-
For the things that accomplish with the puzzling nature of Legion[the devil; father of the beliefs] and of the abominations/beliefs of the earth lead to the opposite effect: anything other than the simple IMMEDIATE receiving and keeping of a word as soon as it is spoken.
-
Paraphrased scripture: ”Truly I say to you, I have not found such constant fidelity with anyone in Israel. Many will come from east and west, and recline at the table with Abraham, Isaac and Jacob in the kingdom of heaven; but the sons of the kingdom will be cast out into the outer darkness; in that place there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.’
And JEHAVEH’SHUA, which means I AM IS THE SALVATION, said to the Roman centurion, ”Go home; it shall be done for you according to your fidelity[loyalty].’
-
What proceeded from bestiae obscurae[spiritually imposed doctrine]: ”...as you have believed.’
-
Would it be possible to deceive without making someone believe(have faith)??
-
To make one believe(have faith) is to please the father of the beliefs/lies, the demon.
Brennakimi wrote: ”this is faith. that you know your god so well and are so confident...’
Is this faith[reliance on trust or belief], that one knows the true Eternal Being so well, as Mosheh, Abraham, EliJah and all the prophets of Jehaveh knew and did not even mention the false word ”faith’????
Why did they not speak in allegiance to the falseness that is called faith??; For the Hebrew part of the Scriptures, [the entire Old Testament], REMAINED constantly/permanently with the Hebrews, UNLIKE the manuscripts of what has been called New Testament where the word FIDELIS [i.e. Fidelity/Loyalty] as originally written, has been gradually substituted with the words 'fide' and 'fides' [i.e. faith].
-
THE ABOMINATION [FAITH/BELIEF] THAT CAUSES DESOLATION
While reading the Old Testament you can view that wherever the word abomination appears it can be perfectly substituted with the word ”faith’ or ”belief’:
Example: The Egyptians adored, loved and spiritually reverenced their belief/faith that is the cattle. While eating a heifer, the Hebrews were eating the belief/faith of the Egyptians.
And Meshua/Mosheh[which means Saved from the waters] said, It is not proper to do so; for we should sacrifice the belief/faith of the Egyptians to Jehaveh our Adonai: lo, if we sacrificed the belief/faith of the Egyptians before their eyes, would they not stone us?
-
And they set on for him by himself, and for them by themselves, and for the Egyptians who ate with him by themselves; because the Egyptians might not eat bread with the Hebrews, for that [food] is a belief/faith unto the Egyptians.
-
then ye shall say, Thy servants are men that have been occupied with cattle from our youth even until now, both we and our fathers; in order that ye may dwell in the land of Goshen; for every shepherd is against the belief/faith of the Egyptians.
-
The graven images of the gods shall ye burn with fire; thou shalt not covet the silver and gold [that is] on them and take it unto thee, lest thou be ensnared therein; for those things are a belief/faith before Jehaveh thy Adonai.
-
And thou shalt not bring a belief/faith into thy house, lest thou be a cursed thing like it: thou shalt utterly detest it, and thou shalt utterly abhor it; for it is a cursed thing.
-
Thou shalt not do so to Jehaveh thy Adonai; for every [thing that is] a belief/faith to Jehaveh, he hateth, like things which they have done unto the gods; for even their sons and their daughters have they burned in the fire to their gods.
-
..then shalt thou inquire, and make search, and ask diligently; and if it be truth, [and] the thing be certain, that a belief/faith hath happened in the midst of thee, thou shalt surely smite the inhabitants of that city with the edge of the *sword, devoting it to destruction, and all that is therein, and the cattle thereof, with the edge of the sword. And all the spoil of it shalt thou gather into the midst of the open place thereof, and shalt burn the city with fire, and all the spoil thereof, wholly to Yahweh thy Adonai; and it shall be a heap for ever; it shall not be built again. And thou shalt not let anything cleave to thy hand of the devoted thing; that Yahweh may turn from the fierceness of his anger, and shew thee mercy, and have compassion upon thee, and multiply thee, as he hath sworn unto thy fathers; when thou hearkenest to the voice of Yahweh thy Adonai, to keep all his instructions which I instruct thee this day, that thou mayest do what is right in the eyes of Yahweh thy Adonai.
[prophetic code for *sword; the scriptures as originally written]
And ye shall not walk in the customs of the nation which I am casting out before you; for all these things have they done, and they became a belief/faith before me.
-
..and it be told thee, and thou hearest of it; then thou shalt make thorough inquiry, and if it be truth [and] the thing be certain, that this belief/faith hath been wrought in Ishrael, thou shalt bring forth that man or that woman, who committed that wicked thing, unto thy gates, the man or the woman, and shalt stone them with stones, that they die. At the mouth of two witnesses, or three witnesses, shall he that is to die be put to death: he shall not be put to death at the mouth of one witness. The hands of the witnesses shall be first upon him to put him to death, and afterwards the hands of all the people; and thou shalt put evil away from thy midst.
-
Cursed be the man that maketh a *graven or *molten image, a * belief/faith before Jehaveh, a work of the craftsman's hand..
*or a religious thing; The prophetic code for *graven or molten image also means doctrinal spiritual image(s); religious statutes.
-
..and because of these beliefs/faiths Jehaveh thy Adonai doth dispossess them from before thee. Thou shalt be perfect with Jehaveh thy Adonai. For these nations, which thou shalt dispossess..
And Solomon went after Ashtoreth the goddess of the Zidonians, and after Milcom the belief/faith of the Ammonites.
Then did Solomon build a high place for Chemosh the belief/faith of the Moabites, on the hill that is before Jerrutzsalem, and for Molech the belief/faith of the children of Ammon.
And the high places that were before Jerrutzsalem, which were on the right hand of the mount of corruption, which Solomon the king of Israel had built for Ashtoreth the belief/faith of the Zidonians, and for Chemosh the belief/faith of the Moabites, and for Milcom the belief/faith of the children of Ammon, did the king defile.
And none taketh it to heart, neither is there knowledge nor understanding to say, I have burned part of it in the fire, and have also baked bread upon the coals thereof, I have roasted flesh, and eaten [it], and with the rest thereof shall I make a belief/faith? shall I bow down to a block of wood?
And I brought you into a fruitful land, to eat the fruit thereof and the good thereof; and ye entered and defiled my land, and made my heritage a belief/faith.
Ye stand upon your sword, ye work belief/faith, and ye defile every one his neighbour's wife; and shall ye possess the land?
-
And forces shall stand on his part, and they shall profane the sanctuary, the fortress, and shall take away the continual [sacrifice], and they shall place the belief/faith that maketh desolate.
And from the time that the continual [sacrifice] is taken away, and the belief/faith that maketh desolate set up, [there shall be] a thousand, two hundred, and ninety days.
Judah hath dealt with unfidelity, and an belief/faith is made in Israel and in Jerrutzsalem; for Judah hath profaned the sanctuary of Jehaveh which he loved, and hath married the daughter of a strange ‘’god.
-
When therefore ye shall see the belief/faith of desolation, which is spoken of through Daniel the prophet, [what is] **standing where it ought not, in a holy place, he that reads let him understand,
**holy place encoded; HOLY BIBLE; a holy field/place that became desolated; adultered versions of New Testaments,
-
But when ye shall see the belief/faith of desolation standing where it ought not, he that reads let him consider it, then let those in Judaea flee to the mountains;
-
And he said to them, *Ye* are they who justify themselves before men, but the Eternal knows your hearts; for what amongst men is highly thought of is an belief/faith before the Eternal Celestial.
-
on her forehead the spiritual title: Mystery of Babylon - The *Mother of the beliefs/faiths and [spiritual] prostitution of souls of the earth.
* encoded; the only woman[city; congregation; church] that calls herself by the spiritual title 'Mother' - Holy Matrix(mother) Babylonical(which also means 'great' in size) Gothic Romanesque church.
-
And nothing common, nor that maketh a belief/faith and a lie, shall at all enter into it; but those only who [are] written in the book of life of the Lamb.
-
Thank you
Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : the word 'leaves'
Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : Romanesque
Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : abomination where it ought not; in the **holy place: HOLY BIBLE; a holy field/place that became desolated; adultered versions of New Testaments
Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : [what is] **standing where it ought not, in a holy place, he that reads let him understand,
Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : IMMEDIATE receiving and keeping of a word as soon as it is spoken.

  
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 1182 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 60 of 86 (390292)
03-19-2007 5:53 PM
Reply to: Message 58 by macaroniandcheese
03-12-2007 8:29 PM


PERPETUAL ETERNAL COVENANT`s SYNCHRONY leaves no room for faith
-
UPDATED transcription of fragment of the letter to the Ephesians:
For it is by the spontaneous graciousness [YAHWEH’s unmerited willing love] that you are saved [declared righteous; having your spiritual account completely and eternally clear, without debts nor credits] through FIDELITY [to the One that has sent the Lamb]. And this [salvation] does NOT depend on anything of your own [does not depend whether on religious reliance(faith) or good works], for it is a gift of YAHWEH.
-
Would a little child hear a word and then spiritually impose a condition by saying that he/she would NOT receive it unless through BELIEVING(having faith) that the word he/she hears is true?
Would the Word that became flesh convince the little child that the word he/she hears is to be received through BELIEVING(having faith) rather than through his/her natural acceptance on saying a YES answer?
-
This is the covenant’s synchrony: That the ALL may be made ONE. Like thou YAHWEH art in me, I in thee, that they may be ONE in us. I in them, they in me, that they may be perfect in ONE.
-
In order to be perfect in ONE,
What is it that is PRESENT in the synchrony between the Lamb and YAHWEH [Who has sent the Word that became flesh] that is exactly what needs to be PRESENT for the COMPLETENESS of synchrony between you and YAHWEH??
The only possible one-word answer is FIDELITY [Total Fidelity to the One that has sent the Word that became flesh],
for if it was faith(religious faith), that would be the same as to say that the Lamb had to believe(have faith) in order TO BE the Word that became flesh.
It is because of that total synchrony on being made ONE, and on being made EQUAL [with regard to the graciousness of a willing love], that the Lamb said ”I will call you ”FRIENDS’, not servants, for the servants do not KNOW what their lord does.
Why would one appreciate to be spiritually a servant [or spiritually a slave], which would coincide with the system [that is called ”hierarchy’] that proceeded from the nature of the wide door of re’Legion and abominations/faiths of the earth?
For there one does not need to KNOW/ASCERTAIN the PRESENCE of the Holy One, because all that is needed there is to believe(have faith; or non-hesitation) that the presence of their system’s elohim might be there. But why would that non-hesitation be needed if in fact the elohim there is a present one?
-
While mining for truth in all of the books from the Ancient Testament, in not one of them is found any instruction saying that one needs to believe(have faith).
Istead, in all of them, the eternal words do attest and instruct that man needs to be constant in loyalty and remain through total FIDELITY to Jehaveh of the Hosts.
For even in the books of the Prophets, while instructing the good News of a perpetual eternal covenant, Jehaveh of the Hosts does not mention anything about believing(having faith). Istead, gives the clear and precise instruction that man ought to be with permanent and constant understanding[knowledge] while remaining into the bond of the perpetual eternal covenant:
I will put my Law [my Words] in their inward parts, and will WRITE it in their heart; And they shall teach no more every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, KNOW Jehaveh; for they shall all KNOW me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith Jehaveh: for I will pardon their iniquity, and their sin will I remember no more.
And I will cause you to pass under the rod, and I will bring you into the bond of the covenant.
In the time that it is said ”all the books of the Ancient Testament’, let the total writings through twenty-five Prophets of Jehaveh, including EliYah and Elishuab, be highlighted. For not one of them did ever relate TRUE FIDELITY[constant loyalty] to any need of believing(having faith). Instead, all of the twenty-five prophesied about the need of man’s total Fidelity for him to be in SYNCHRONY with Jehaveh’s willing love.
Jehaveh`s eternal words in the books of the Ancients are the supporting foundations firm in the Rock [The Scriptures as originally written]. Not in the sand(versions of scriptures and adulterated copies of the manuscripts of the New Testament).
Example: Sefer Tehilim [book of Psalms] that shows up with the word ”pierce’ replacing the words ”seize like a lion’, is a false Sefer Tehilim that belongs to the wide door of religion and abominations/faiths of the earth.
-
THE LAMB - Then and Now
[The acceptance through a LAMB; The Before and After]
-
While living in Ishrael, in ancient times, you could see the tent of the Tabernacle standing. In those days you would take your best lamb, write your name on its forehead and then send it to the altar for him to die in your place.
And you would not have to believe(have faith) nor hesitate, for no believing is needed when all the clear and precise instructions are PRESENT and firm into the Rock[The books of the Law, or of the Prophets or the Sefer Tehilim as originally written];
That when a lamb is sent to die in your place, all one has to do is to keep and retain the words of that instruction by simply RECOGNIZING that YAHWEH declares you righteous. According to all that is firm and supported into the Rock, you were not requested to believe(have faith) nor hesitate, for the instruction does not mention the need of any religious reliance(faith; or non-hesitation), but your RECOGNITION of the facts.
If you were not requested to believe(have faith) when the lamb that you sent was just a SHADE of the reality, MUCH LESS believing(religious faith) is requested NOW that the REALITY itself is PRESENT in FULLNESS and COMPLETENESS. Much less believing is needed NOW that you have a TRUE REMISSION LAMB constantly PRESENT. Don't it make you feel bad when you're tryin' to find your way home
and you don't know which way to go? In the time that the levee of souls that support a prostitute woman breaks, she will hear the words: ’*Momma you got to go’. [*a Babylonical(great) and Gothic Romanesca momma].
-
THE HIDDEN TREASURE Kept Secret In The Parable
In the beginning of the centuries words from a lot of fragments of scripture were substituted, but the hidden treasure in the parables remains intact, as it is said in the perpetual eternal Covenant: I will open my mouth in parables; I will utter things which have been kept secret from the Initial time.
A hidden treasure has been kept secret in the parable of the Unforgiving Official, for it means much more than a mere ”do onto others as you would have them do onto you’. When decrypted through a laconic form this parable reveals once and for all that true forgiveness [remission of sins and TRUE JUSTIFICATION] has NOTHING to do with believing(having faith).
If you are declared righteous or had all your debts pardoned, this is a fact and the only thing that is left for you to do is to RECOGNIZE that you have no spiritual debts to pay nor spiritual credits that could be saved in your account any longer. Your account is completely clear eternally to not pay nor to be paid either.
If the acceptance through which you do RECOGNIZE that, before the graciousness and PRESENCE of the One that has sent the Lamb, is that of a YES from a little child, it has nothing to do whether with believing(having faith) or hesitating.
Does the fact of having been declared righteous give you the right to feed on the believing that you are highlighted or distinguished from anyone that would be forgiven by you??
What differentiates you from any other person that would be forgiven by you??
-
If you understand, ascertain and comprehend that the One who has sent the Lamb is PRESENT, just as the Adonai was present in the parable, and declares that your account is eternally clear, that moment is not proper for a response other than your YES or NO answer.
When forgiveness is given to you that way, as attested in the parable, that is a fact which has no involvement regarding believing(having faith), because there`s nothing you can do besides accepting or refusing what is being given. Any type of acceptance that intends to go beyond that of a little child`s YES or NO answer, is a believing and coincides with the nature of the father of the beliefs/lies.
-
The eternal instruction in the parable of the Unforgiving official prevents one from becoming an accomplice of double oppression:
1st. - The believing that the fact of having been declared righteous highlights or differentiates you from anyone that would be forgiven by you, which is an oppressive arrogance against the Eternal`s graciousness and right to choose, that is the Eternal`s spontaneous will on sealing and sanctifying.
The fact that the Lamb died physically in your place gives the sureness that the times have been abbreviated on behalf of everyone that the PRESENCE of the Eternal Being comes to seal and choose. Justification [to be declared righteous] is just the first step in order for you to be chosen and sealed.
2nd. - Forgiveness is INVALIDATED through believing or thinking that you were declared righteous for having in you an acceptance other than that of the simple YES from a little child. Would any other type of acceptance be in synchrony with the willing love and graciousness of the One who has sent the Lamb??
-
This is the short format of the instruction from the parable of the Unforgiving Official:
Do NOT invalidate that forgiveness by believing or thinking that you were declared righteous for having in you any type of acceptance that highlights or differentiates you from anyone that would be forgiven by you, which means, anything that makes you feel spiritually highlighted or distinguished from anyone, whether through believing(having faith) or good works.
-
THE SPIRITUAL NATURE OF BELIEVING
. But what is puzzling you is the nature of re`Legion`s game.
-
This is why believing is the spiritual nature of the demon[the father of the beliefs/lies]:
I. - You hear the word
II. - but you impose a condition in which you are
III. - spiritually saying that you will NOT receive it
IV. - unless through BELIEVING that what
V. - you hear is true.
And whenever you impose that condition, before the PRESENCE of the Eternal Holy One that watches you always somewhere, spiritually you make it sound like the demon[Legion] is so close to you that even the word you receive could, [according to that imposed condition of whether believing or hesitating], be the demon`s.
-
Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : when her levee breaks

This message is a reply to:
 Message 58 by macaroniandcheese, posted 03-12-2007 8:29 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 61 by macaroniandcheese, posted 03-19-2007 6:22 PM goldenlightArchangel has replied

  
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 1182 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 62 of 86 (390450)
03-20-2007 1:15 PM
Reply to: Message 61 by macaroniandcheese
03-19-2007 6:22 PM


Re: PERPETUAL ETERNAL COVENANT`s SYNCHRONY leaves no room for faith
-
Wrote: why did you reply this to me?
In the instrinsic reason why you replied to me first, to share knowledge/understanding.
-
Wrote: is synchrony a word?
Yes
Synchrony \Syn"chro*ny\, n.
The concurrence of events in time; synchronism. [R.]
[1913 Webster]
synchrony
n : the relation that exists when things occur at the same time;
"the drug produces an increased synchrony of the brain
waves" [syn: synchronism, synchronicity,
synchroneity, synchronization, synchronisation,
synchronizing] [ant: asynchronism]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 61 by macaroniandcheese, posted 03-19-2007 6:22 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 63 by macaroniandcheese, posted 03-20-2007 1:37 PM goldenlightArchangel has not replied

  
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 1182 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 68 of 86 (390960)
03-22-2007 6:17 PM
Reply to: Message 66 by jessie
03-21-2007 12:55 PM


CREDERE - The type of credit that is not possible to be covered
Hi SALVADEJAH,
-
CREDERE is the word in Roman language that came to be translated as BELIEVE.
The word CREDERE which means ”give a credit’ has been utilized to designate the giving of TWO types of credit: The financial credit and the spiritual credit.
-
The financial credit is given through money, gold and material things.
The spiritual credit is given through low grades of spiritual *adjuration[solemn promise], in which spiritually one highlights the trusting that this type of credit is worth more [or would be more valuable] than a simple word [spoken whether through a quiet and secret request or a simple yes or no answer].
-
* [Only the Most Holy, who has the right to TERMINATE(put an end), has the right to INITIATE a spiritual or eternal promise].
-
** [The word adjure(solemn promise) originated from the Roman word Giurare (swear) to which has also been attributed the meaning of ”interest’(financial interest), in Latin languages like the Portuguese word ”juros’ that means swear and financial interest].
-
If you give spiritual credit, you’re making a short form of spiritual adjuration, for spiritually you do not own those credits to give [Your spirit is not a property of your own; you do not have the right to touch or compromise it whenever you want].
-
When a spiritual credit is given, one submits his/her spirit under adjuration. For in the eternal instructions YAHWEH says that man ought not to do anything that could violate the integrity of the KADHESH[separation; holiness] of your body as well as to not do anything similar with regard to your spirit[the living electricity that runs through the nerves; the energy into the inward part of your body].
-
Your spirit is a property of which the Word that became flesh said to keep in total KADHESH to YAHWEH of the Hosts.
-
And if you grant spiritual credit you’re giving what you do not have [while giving a credit from what you yourself could not own]. Your spirit is not a property which you could own or have the right to touch by the means through which a spiritual credit is given, as if you could take convincement from it or make it believable.
-
The giving of spiritual credit is only possible through utilizing the system of religion, the wide door of spiritual abominations/faiths of the earth, a spiritual trading that results, in fact, in convincement before men or one oneself in the measure that he/she self-promotes his/her spirit by proving (through religious faith) that the system’s absent elohim (which is seriously in need to be believed in order to exist), or [adulterated] versions of scripture can provide him/her more access to the type of credits that he/she gives.
-
For it is not possible to keep spiritual believing(or faith) without the giving of spiritual credit, as well as it is not possible to give spiritual credit without resulting in one-oneself making him/herself believable, which is also spiritual self-promotion and opressive arrogance. For, to who is it that he/she is making his/her spirit believable to?
If not to men nor to him/herself, then where is the fragment of scripture in the entire Ancient Testamente proving [or giving the understanding] that the Most Holy would ever reward man for making him/herself believable?
-
Instead, YAHWEH’s eternal words firm into the Rock [Hebrew scripture as originally written] attest through JeremYah that nothing ought to ever give spiritual credits to man, whether spiritually trusting in man or receiving spiritual credits from man.
-
The eternal rejection is clear [in the eternal instructions, Ancient Testament] against the spiritually imposed doctrines of faith/abomination that have kept the bizarre habit of stating that the Word that became flesh would receive or be interested in the receiving of spiritual credits from man.
-
It is through the word from the mouth that one ought to be justified, whether through a quiet and secret request or a simple yes or no answer. The word only is what SYNCHRONIZES you with the natural purpose to which you were made: to let YAHWEH’s Spirit of KADHESH inhabit and be sheltered by you, knowing that the Most Holy does not only want your body,
but wants you.
-
In the time of the times,
by getting rid of the type of credit that is not possible to be covered,
there is a chance he/she will be there under the clouds of shining glory of the perpetual name that remains eternally.
-
Through fidelitate[being constant] is [manifest] the substance of what is HOPED.
As well as
Through fidelitate[being permanent] is [manifest] the evidence of things not seen.
-
What is the real substance that Abraham HOPED??
Answer: Isaac
For through being constant[FIDELITY]
is [manifest by the power of YAHWEH]
the real substance, in this case, Isaac.
-
What is the true evidence that was not seen before Abraham heard [from YAHWEH] that it was his FIDELITY[Abraham’s consistent permanence] that needed to be proven true??
Answer: the lamb to die in the place of his son
Is [in that moment]
the evidence of what was not seen, before that moment.
The completeness of voice and total accuracy of the New [including all the letters and writing of the apostles],
You will only find by bringing up the Song of the Lamb [the New and perpetual eternal covenant] straight and directly SIDE BY SIDE with the Song of Mosheh [the books of the Ancients].
-
-------------------------------------------This has been updated for consistency:
-
Was it a believing [credere; religious faith] that had to be proven true?
No. For it is through receiving the type of credit that is from the spirit of man, [(which the man himself does not own neither have the right to touch by the means of spiritual convincement; to make himself believable)], that one does spiritually trust in the spirit of man
-
What is it that had to be proven true?
-
Answer: The PRESENCE of Abraham’s total fidelitate to YAHWEH of the Hosts
-
Updated definition of fidelity - fidelitate - Constant permanence on remaining true and firm with regard to giving the right of precedency to an only one.
-
credere - Presence of believing(faith or non-hesitation) to any elohim who is seriously in need to be believed in order to exist, shows up momentarily in the brains that are cauterized by religion.
-
fidelitate - PRESENCE of constant permanence on remaining true and firm with regard to giving the right of precedency to the words/instructions of an Only 0ne only can be proven through a real fact.
-
Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : updating
Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : updating

This message is a reply to:
 Message 66 by jessie, posted 03-21-2007 12:55 PM jessie has not replied

  
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 1182 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 69 of 86 (391163)
03-23-2007 6:06 PM
Reply to: Message 66 by jessie
03-21-2007 12:55 PM


UPDATED Definition of Fidelity - fidelitate
Hi SALVADEJAH,
-
-
-------------------------------------------This has been updated for consistency:
-
Was it a believing [credere; religious faith] that had to be proven true?
-
No. For it is through receiving the type of credit that is from the spirit of man, [(which the man himself does not own neither have the right to touch by the means of spiritual convincement; to make himself believable)], that one does spiritually trust in man and makes [from the spirit of man's] flesh his [spiritual] arm [or spiritual strength].
-
What is it that had to be proven true?
-
Answer: The PRESENCE of Abraham’s total fidelitate to YAHWEH of the Hosts
-
Updated definition of fidelity - fidelitate - Constant permanence on remaining true and firm with regard to giving the right of precedency to an only one.
-
credere - Presence of believing(faith or non-hesitation) to any elohim who is seriously in need to be believed in order to exist, shows up momentarily in the brains that are cauterized by religion.
-
fidelitate - PRESENCE of constant permanence on remaining true and firm with regard to giving the right of precedency to the words/instructions of an Only 0ne only can be proven through a real fact.
-

This message is a reply to:
 Message 66 by jessie, posted 03-21-2007 12:55 PM jessie has not replied

  
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 1182 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 70 of 86 (400356)
05-12-2007 5:44 PM


hidden treasure
Hi,
I'd like your view point on this
CREDIBILITY. Worthiness of belief. To entitle a witness to credibility, he must be competent. - [Law Dictionary at Datasegment]
Competence \Com"pe*tence\, Competency \Com"pe*ten*cy\, n. tence, from L. competentia agreement.
1. The state of being competent; fitness; ability; adequacy;
power.
-
lef - To man was not given the spiritual competence to entitle the Eternal to credibility.
-
Bet - It is not of man's competence to measure or evaluate the Eternal's credibility, for the one who entitles to credibility must have that type of spiritual competence.
-
Gímel - Man does not have the spiritual competence to entitle the Eternal to credibility, much less competence if it is done through a man's work on a belief, credere or giving of spiritual credit.
-
Dálet - It is not possible for man to give spiritual credits before the Amazing and Excellent presence of the Eternal YHWH, for everything that results from man’s measurement and evaluation on the Eternal’s credibility, including man's work on belief or credere, will tend to discontinue.
-
He - If the one who entitles the Eternal to credibility does not have that type of spiritual competence, much less competence will he have to affirm that the Eternal would have ever said that spiritual credits from man’s works on belief would be received.
-
This has been updated for consistency,
-
Vav - It is not possible to the one that intends to work on a strong belief or give spiritual credit, to do it without man spiritually entitling himself competent enough to measure or evaluate YHWH’s Worthiness of belief - credibility, for the one that says 'I believe' - for a spiritual purpose - must be sure that the spiritual credit he gives will validate, or 'credit as true', what truth is supposed to be.
-
Záyin - In the time that 'believe' spiritually means 'to credit as true', the one that credits must support by the foundation - the Testimony of the Law and of the Prophets - that he was given the competence to validate, or 'credit as true', what truth is supposed to be.
-
1st. - In which fragment of scripture do the eternal words attest that the loyal ones ought not to call on [the name that requests total KADHISH-holiness] through the path of belief or a type of reliance that is doctrinal image and likeness of credere [giving of spiritual credit]??
Two responses to this are found in the books of the Prophets. - the two entries are found synchronized in IsaYah and JeremYah.
-
2nd. - Was it given to man the spiritual authority to have the final say on whether YHWH is worthy to be credited or not??
-
In the beginning and in the sequence of times,
to man was given only one form of evaluation by which it is lawful for him to ascertain and evaluate the Eternal's authenticity and righteousness.
And that only one form - love with all his/her understanding, giving ears, seeing, listening and ascertaining with love.
-
3rd. - Is belief [credere or any credibility's measurement line from man's heart] not a 'work on' of man??
-
4th. - Is it lawful for the spirit of man to evaluate YHWH's credibility [or validity] by measuring it through the measurement line that is called credere/belief and man's final say on whether he credits or not??
-
In the field at IsaYah and JeremYah there are proofs that it is not just a question of what nor who the people fears, but ”what type of spiritual fear?’ and ”through which way or path do they fear?’:
For, if he/she is in the ways of YHWH, now as in the beginning,
to man is given the total authority to love the Most Holy above all things,
and to man was not given the spiritual authority to have the final say on whether YHWH is worthy to be credited or not. - Is this love with all his/her understanding and ascertaining?'
As if it was not attested at IsaYAH, in the scriptures as originally written, that 'to YHWH of the Hosts you shall regard in a separate way' - way - a real and total KADHISH-holiness to YHWH.
For one ought not to call upon the KADHISH-holiness of the Most Holy by the same means that Romanesca Mother church prostitute and her protestant daughters have been doing: through the path of belief and by credere - for it is by belief - the way - the path - that man becomes the begetter or father [the one who has the final say] of his belief, like the demon [the father of the beliefs/lies] that does not know what truth is by simply giving ears [through seeing, reading, hearing, listening, inclining all his/her understanding] to a word or instruction.
It is very easy to believe. But this - the question that the Word that became flesh has been asking in the manuscripts as originally written: ”Will you keep emunah [total fidelitate] to YHWH alone??’
is about constant permanence on remaining firm and true with regard to giving the right of precedency to the word of an only One.
The doctrinal image of the scarlet beast says: ..do you believe..’ - But if the way through which you call upon the name that remains eternally is YHWH’s way, path and means, then that is a narrow door and tight trail.
[truth is YHWH’s word and instruction, which the father of beliefs/lies does not know nor comprehend, but believes only].
In the time that you find the treasure, then it will be viewed that whatever spiritual adjuration, or solemn vow from the spirit of man, that is done having these two elements:
I. - man’s purpose from the heart.
II. - man believing that his spirit[of man] was given the authority of having the final say on whether a word [or YHWH, or YHWH’s instruction] is worthy to be credited as true or not.
does fit with the giving of spiritual credits, belief, that are the means and the ways by which one calls upon jesus [the man's name that the inhabitants of the land do claim to fame] or belief’s Lord-God.
Would you be praised for being treated with that same type of reliance [belief's measurement of validity and credibility from the praise and worshipping doctrinal image] that Romanesque Mother prostitute church and the protestant daughters do treat their jesus or belief’s Lord-God??
------------------------------------------ English Standard paraphrased
For YHWH spoke thus to me with his strong hand upon me, and warned me not to walk in the way of this people, saying:
"Do not call [through the] adjuration [of] all that this people calls [in their] [solemn] adjurations,
and do not fear [through the ways of] their fear, nor be in dread.
But YHWH of hosts, him you shall regard in a holy[separate] way. Let him [YHWH'S presence] be [the cause of] your fear, and let him be your dread.
[Let the presence of YHWH alone be the origin and cause of your spiritual trembling-evidence, rather than whatever is caused by belief or 'work on' from the heart of man. - wherever one is present, there is no need of belief that he is there]. - Blessed are those whose heart is kept clean, for they will see YHWH.
*heart is kept clean from trash, belief, doctrines of faith, credere or anything that cares to bring up to memory that the Eternal words would supposedly need to be credited or validated 'as true' as something that man [through belief] evaluates to be true in order for it to not be treated as trash. - As if the spirit of man could take from himself the measurement line to evaluate what truth is, as well as to validate the Eternal's credibility on whether the Most Holy would be walking the line or not.
Pure \Pure\, a. [Compar. Purer; superl. Purest.] among my elected ones. I will hope in YHWH, who is hiding his face from the house of Jacob, and I will hope in him. Behold, I and the children whom YHWH has given me are signs and portents in Israel from YHWH of hosts, who dwells on Mount Zion.
To the Law [or Instruction] and to the Testimony! If they will not speak according to this word, it is because they have no dawn.
------------------------------------------- Holman Standard paraphrased:
For this is what YHWH said to me with great power, to keep me from going the way of this people:
Do not call an alliance, everything [that]
these people call [in their] alliance.
Do not fear their [type of] fear;
do not be terrified.
The above paraphrases were founded in the following translations that bring up the word conjuration [solemn spiritual adjuration] rather than other terms that helped to keep the treasure hidden:
Italian
**Poiché cosí mi ha parlato l'Eterno con mano potente e mi ha avvertito di non camminare per la via di questo popolo, dicendo:
**Non chiamate congiura tutto ci che questo popolo chiama congiura, non temete ci che esso teme e non spaventatevi.
L'Eterno degli eserciti, lui dovete santificare. Sia lui il vostro timore, sia lui il vostro spavento. - La Nuova Diodati - Isaiah - The vision concerning Judah and - Bible Gateway
Portuguese
..me disse com mo forte, e me ensinou que no andasse pelo caminho deste povo, dizendo:
**, No chameis conjurao, a tudo quanto este povo chama conjurao; e no temais o seu temor, nem tampouco vos assombreis.
Ops...
Spanish
... y me ense que no caminase por el camino de este pueblo, diciendo:
**No llaméis, conjuracin, a todas las cosas a que este pueblo llama conjuracin; ...
Anonymous (Bible): Holy Bible: Spanish Sagradas Escrituras - Christian Classics Ethereal Library
The word conjuration - from Ancient Roman Language 'conjurare', to swear together - If Scripture was to be interpreted spiritually, then the words conjuration[or spiritual adjuration] in that fragment ought to be interpreted as an spiritual invocation or evocation [the latter in the sense of binding by a vow from the spirit of man]. - wikipedia says: The word ”conjuration’ is often used synonymously with "invocation", although the two are not synonyms. One who performs conjurations is called a conjurer or conjuror.
.
Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : Paragraphs at Vav and Zayin
Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : truth is
Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update Vav and Zayin

  
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 1182 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 71 of 86 (400736)
05-16-2007 1:55 PM


Is there competence to validate, by belief, what truth is supposed to be??
Hello,
Vav and Záyin have been updated for consistency,
-
lef - To man was not given the spiritual competence to entitle the Eternal to credibility.
-
Bet - It is not of man's competence to measure or evaluate the Eternal's credibility, for the one who entitles to credibility must have that type of spiritual competence.
-
Gímel - Man does not have the spiritual competence to entitle the Eternal to credibility, much less competence if it is done through a man's work on a belief, credere or giving of spiritual credit.
-
Dálet - It is not possible for man to give spiritual credits before the Amazing and Excellent presence of the Eternal YHWH, for everything that results from man’s measurement and evaluation on the Eternal’s credibility, including man's work on belief or credere, will tend to discontinue.
-
He - If the one who entitles the Eternal to credibility does not have that type of spiritual competence, much less competence will he have to affirm that the Eternal would have ever said that spiritual credits from man’s works on belief would be received.
-
Vav - It is not possible to the one that intends to work on a strong belief or give spiritual credit, to do it without man spiritually entitling himself competent enough to measure or evaluate YHWH’s Worthiness of belief - credibility, for the one that says 'I believe' - for a spiritual purpose - must be sure that the spiritual credit he gives will validate, or 'credit as true', what truth is supposed to be.
-
Záyin - In the time that 'believe' spiritually means 'to credit as true', the one that credits must support by the foundation - the Testimony of the Law and of the Prophets - that he was given the competence to validate, or 'credit as true', what truth is supposed to be.
.

  
goldenlightArchangel
Member (Idle past 1182 days)
Posts: 583
From: Roraima Peak
Joined: 02-11-2004


Message 86 of 86 (405564)
06-13-2007 5:20 PM
Reply to: Message 66 by jessie
03-21-2007 12:55 PM


The Thin Red Line that separates Kadhish from being questioned
Hi SALVADEJAH,
Amen = Aemonáh = Emunah -- Hebrew -- = Fidelitate -- Ancient Roman -- = Fidelitá -- Modern Roman-Italian -- = Fidelity = constant permanence on remaining firm and true with regard to giving the right of precendency to the word from an only One.
-
1st. - How can one make the distinction between 'do you believe? All is possible to him that believes' -- i.e. from the adulterated master copy that made famous the man's name Iesus Kristus -- which is not YHWH's name --,
and 'will you keep emunah to YHWH? All is possible to him/her that keeps emunah - [total right of precedency being given to YHWH]' -- Id Est a paraphrase from one's ascertaining on the ultimate compilation/proof founded into the Rock of Israel -- The Testimony of the Law and of the Prophets --,
-
In order for one to ascertain the above distinction,
he/she has the option of investigating--inquiring this one first:
-
2nd. - What is it that is being questioned -- asked or interrogated -- in the words 'do you believe', which is from the adulterated master copy that had been showing up with the man's name Iesus Kristus??
-
If you remove the word 'you' from the question 'will you keep emunah to YHWH?' - the question will still hold the significance and meaning of
-
'Will --the emunah to YHWH-- be kept?'
-
But if you remove the word 'you' from the version 'do you believe' -- which was originated from the throne of the dragon,
then view it --,
-
what is being questioned -- asked or interrogated -- is the following demonic question:
-
'Is [YHWH's Kadhish -- Holiness] to be credited as true?'
-
If considered that the word 'believe' spiritually means:
-
'to have a final say with regard to worthiness of Holiness'
-
and: 'to credit as true the things in the time that total sureness is not attributed to them',
-
then, even if you keep the word 'you'-- the version from the adulterated master copy does spiritually still sound demonic:
-
'What is your final say --or decision-- about believing in that?' - - 'will you credit -- YHWH's Kadhish -- Holiness -- as something true?'
-
While responding with a question,
Is -- YHWH's Kadhish -- Holiness -- to be put in check, or questioned, in the first place??
-
Is there not a thin red line that separates Kadhish -- Holiness -- from being questioned?
-
Peace
and Emunah

This message is a reply to:
 Message 66 by jessie, posted 03-21-2007 12:55 PM jessie has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024