Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,920 Year: 4,177/9,624 Month: 1,048/974 Week: 7/368 Day: 7/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Thou Shalt Not Kill - Except......?
iceage 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5945 days)
Posts: 1024
From: Pacific Northwest
Joined: 09-08-2003


Message 8 of 36 (372024)
12-24-2006 2:25 PM
Reply to: Message 7 by Hyroglyphx
12-24-2006 1:54 PM


Re: Thou shalt not murder
NJ writes:
Murder and killing is two different things
I think straggler has an interesting point. The difference between Murder and Killing is often a purely human distinction.
When the bibliolatrist and fundamentalist excuse the supposedly godly commanded genocide of the old testament they are invoking the same arguement that the islamist bomber does - this is not murder but sanctified killing ordained and approved by god.
The obvious and unavoidable flaw in this thinking is that they are saying that God, the omniscient creator of all, is somehow incapable of doing his own life extinguishing acts, but requires the assistance of his devout followers. Or I alternately you could argue that God wants his devout followers to experience the blessing and cleansing act of killing the infidels (including small children and the unborn).

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by Hyroglyphx, posted 12-24-2006 1:54 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 11 by Hyroglyphx, posted 12-24-2006 3:44 PM iceage has replied

  
iceage 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5945 days)
Posts: 1024
From: Pacific Northwest
Joined: 09-08-2003


Message 14 of 36 (372042)
12-24-2006 4:16 PM
Reply to: Message 11 by Hyroglyphx
12-24-2006 3:44 PM


Re: Thou shalt not murder
nj writes:
There is warfare and there are acts of criminal conduct.
No, am talking about sanctified killing. Osoma genuinely believes he is in warfare against the ungodly.
I have a question for you.
Would you say that Osoma is wrong because he has the wrong read on God? Not necessarily wrong because his actions are opposed to some larger ethical principle.
nj writes:
If you espouse that morals are relative then you give yourself no basis to criticize anyone else's beliefs.
Whoa... Where am i espousing that morals are relative. Try not to suppose what I think.
nj writes:
So let me just ask you: Is it wrong of God if He committed genocide?
First clarify - God commit genocide or God commanding his subjects to commit genocide.
nj writes:
If you say, "I personally believe that it is wrong, but right and wrong are only concepts that we devise. It isn't either right or wrong. Its only wrong for me." To which I would reply, "Well, I think its right. And since morals are relative and abstract concepts, case closed. There's nothing left to discuss."
I would never say that. You seem to want to pigeon hole my views into a false perspective (strawman) because you have a pat answer.
A bibliolatrist mistakenly believes their morals or ethical views are grounded in the absolute when actually their views are relative to some writings that contain some of the worst examples of human behavior.
Edited by iceage, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by Hyroglyphx, posted 12-24-2006 3:44 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 19 by Hyroglyphx, posted 12-24-2006 8:22 PM iceage has replied

  
iceage 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5945 days)
Posts: 1024
From: Pacific Northwest
Joined: 09-08-2003


Message 22 of 36 (372111)
12-25-2006 12:11 AM
Reply to: Message 19 by Hyroglyphx
12-24-2006 8:22 PM


Re: Thou shalt not murder
iceage writes:
Osoma genuinely believes he is in warfare against the ungodly.
nj writes:
So? Haven't you ever heard that everyone in jail is an innocent man? There's always some sort of justification in their mind. Their sincerity doesn't mean that it measures up to God's standards.
What does jail and innocence have to do this issue? This reference has no connection.
Yes, likewise the fundamentalist (Islamic or Christian) always has some sort of justification to excuse the evil that is portrayed in their holy book as godly. Sincerity does not matter. Thanks for illustrating my point.
nj writes:
I don't know Osama so I can't say what his disposition is
I don't have to know Osama to know that he is guided by a false sense of divine sanction. The promoting of killing under the banner of god is wrong.
iceage writes:
First clarify - God commit genocide or God commanding his subjects to commit genocide.
jn writes:
Some people say that God committed genocide with the Flood.
Nice two step and dodge. I can't answer your question until you clarify without equivocation.
here's a lot of power in that tiny little conjunction, "if."
Really... NJ lets go back and look the context of your paragraph....
Do you not see the error in your own rationale? If you espouse that morals are relative then you give yourself no basis to criticize anyone else's beliefs. Indeed, you are trying to get me to sympathize with your views on relativity, all the while esteeming your own beliefs higher than that of any one else's.
How could I see the the error in my rationale only under the condition of your alleged "if". Your use of "if" was in the sense of "since" as introducing an exclamatory phrase. Honesty is important in discourse.
I mentioned nothing of relative morality or attempted to get you to sympathize with my relative views. A fabrication on your part.
nj writes:
I have deduced that because there are only two options from which to choose from. Well, three actually.
1. All morals are relative.
2. All morals are absolute.
3. Some morals are absolute and some are relative.
Which belief best summarizes your views on the subject?
If you are deducing someones position make it explicitly clear that is what your are doing.
To answer your question, will take door number 3.
I will give you an absolute, that is in line within the context of this thread:
It is morally wrong to kill under the presumption that god has commanded or desires you to kill.
What qualities makes somebody a bibliolatrist and who gets to decide that?
I will give another absolute. A bibliolatrist is a "worshiper of the Bible; a believer in its verbal inspiration".

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by Hyroglyphx, posted 12-24-2006 8:22 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 24 by Hyroglyphx, posted 12-25-2006 12:31 PM iceage has replied

  
iceage 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5945 days)
Posts: 1024
From: Pacific Northwest
Joined: 09-08-2003


Message 25 of 36 (372295)
12-26-2006 12:38 PM
Reply to: Message 24 by Hyroglyphx
12-25-2006 12:31 PM


Re: Thou shalt not murder
Because people that commit these acts know that it is unlawful.
You missed the point entirely. Osoma does not believe at all that his "acts are unlawful". He genuinely believes his is doing gods work. Your jail analogy is off.
nj writes:
I then went on to say that I do believe you espouse moral relativism based on your past responses.
Again whatever did I originally say that made you believe I espoused moral relativism. Please provide a quote from my fist post that led you to believe this.
iceage writes:
I will give another absolute. A bibliolatrist is a "worshiper of the Bible; a believer in its verbal inspiration".
nj writes:
Actually, that's an example of relativity since the criteria isn't simply that someone reveres the Bible as the Word of God, but that gives excessive reverence to it. Again, I'd have to ask what makes it excessive and who gets to make that determination?
No it isn't an example of relativity. Even at that, again you read into it what you wanted! The criteria does not state excessive reverence, it only says "a worshiper" and a "believer in verbal inspiration". It is a Webster definition.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by Hyroglyphx, posted 12-25-2006 12:31 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
iceage 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5945 days)
Posts: 1024
From: Pacific Northwest
Joined: 09-08-2003


Message 30 of 36 (380826)
01-28-2007 11:56 PM
Reply to: Message 29 by Greatest I am
01-28-2007 11:51 PM


Re: Thou shall not
Yes this is an absolute law..... God law seems to fit nicely with our own instincts
What about when the god of Old Testament commands killing?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 29 by Greatest I am, posted 01-28-2007 11:51 PM Greatest I am has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 31 by Greatest I am, posted 01-29-2007 12:21 AM iceage has replied

  
iceage 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5945 days)
Posts: 1024
From: Pacific Northwest
Joined: 09-08-2003


Message 32 of 36 (380829)
01-29-2007 12:54 AM
Reply to: Message 31 by Greatest I am
01-29-2007 12:21 AM


Re: Thou shall not
I alway find it surprising that Christians are in general unaware of the murderous, genocidal, sexual deviant, revengeful passages in the old testament. Here are a few you can do your own research....
Exodus 32:27 writes:
Then he said to them, "This is what the LORD, the God of Israel, says: 'Each man strap a sword to his side. Go back and forth through the camp from one end to the other, each killing his brother and friend and neighbor.' " 28 The Levites did as Moses commanded, and that day about three thousand of the people died.
Numbers 31 writes:
Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him. But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves.
Deuteronomy 20:10 writes:
As you approach a town to attack it, first offer its people terms for peace. If they accept your terms and open the gates to you, then all the people inside will serve you in forced labor. But if they refuse to make peace and prepare to fight, you must attack the town. When the LORD your God hands it over to you, kill every man in the town. But you may keep for yourselves all the women, children, livestock, and other plunder. You may enjoy the spoils of your enemies that the LORD your God has given you.
Deuteronomy 32:41 writes:
If I whet my glittering sword, and mine hand take hold on judgment; I will render vengeance to mine enemies, and will reward them that hate me.
I will make mine arrows drunk with blood, and my sword shall devour flesh; and that with the blood of the slain and of the captives, from the beginning of revenges upon the enemy.
Judges 14:19 in reference to Samson writes:
And the Spirit of the LORD came upon him, and he went down to Ashkelon, and slew thirty men of them, and took their spoil, and gave change of garments unto them which expounded the riddle. And his anger was kindled, and he went up to his father's house.
There is more much more if one looks.
Edited by iceage, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 31 by Greatest I am, posted 01-29-2007 12:21 AM Greatest I am has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 33 by Greatest I am, posted 01-29-2007 2:48 PM iceage has replied

  
iceage 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5945 days)
Posts: 1024
From: Pacific Northwest
Joined: 09-08-2003


Message 35 of 36 (381164)
01-30-2007 1:14 AM
Reply to: Message 33 by Greatest I am
01-29-2007 2:48 PM


Re: Thou shall not
GIAM writes:
These examples are the exact type of statements that Jesus had come to "tear down" His non violent views are well known.
I pray that you direct your message to those that are really in dire need of it....
The literal fundamentalist (both Christian and Muslim) who organize their lives around some really bad and destructive theology.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 33 by Greatest I am, posted 01-29-2007 2:48 PM Greatest I am has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024