|
Author
|
Topic: General discussion of moderation procedures - Part 7
|
AdminJar
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 49 of 304 (327915)
06-30-2006 9:30 PM
|
Reply to: Message 48 by iano
06-30-2006 9:28 PM
|
|
Re: Has EvC changed your beliefs? No
He did get suspended, even before you did.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 48 by iano, posted 06-30-2006 9:28 PM | | iano has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 50 by iano, posted 06-30-2006 9:33 PM | | AdminJar has not replied | | | Message 63 by lfen, posted 07-02-2006 12:32 PM | | AdminJar has not replied |
|
AdminJar
Inactive Member
|
|
|
Message 59 of 304 (328028)
07-01-2006 2:54 PM
|
Reply to: Message 58 by Jazzns
07-01-2006 1:47 PM
|
|
Re: AdminBuzsaw Response
I am asking you to please let this ride for awhile so that the issue can be discussed by the Admin staff.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 58 by Jazzns, posted 07-01-2006 1:47 PM | | Jazzns has not replied |
|
AdminJar
Inactive Member
|
|
|
Message 79 of 304 (328827)
07-04-2006 5:46 PM
|
Reply to: Message 77 by Brian
07-04-2006 5:34 PM
|
|
Re: New rules?
No new rules. Frankly the thread was at the Witching Hour anyway and the infraction pretty minor so I thought the best course was to simply point out that it was across the line and go ahead and close the thread. I don't see any reason for anything more than was done.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 77 by Brian, posted 07-04-2006 5:34 PM | | Brian has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 80 by Brian, posted 07-04-2006 5:53 PM | | AdminJar has not replied |
|
AdminJar
Inactive Member
|
|
|
Message 94 of 304 (329058)
07-05-2006 7:02 PM
|
Reply to: Message 93 by iano
07-05-2006 6:51 PM
|
|
CK, iano and everyone else.
This is for a discussion of moderating procedures. Unless you have something related to moderating procedures, take it somewhere else.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 93 by iano, posted 07-05-2006 6:51 PM | | iano has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 95 by iano, posted 07-05-2006 7:04 PM | | AdminJar has not replied |
|
AdminJar
Inactive Member
|
|
|
Message 103 of 304 (329408)
07-06-2006 2:22 PM
|
Reply to: Message 100 by deerbreh
07-06-2006 2:12 PM
|
|
Re: Now I am confused.
Yes, it was a simple mistake. User Faith has been suspended. She did not see the suspension and so replied. Unfortunately one of the things about our Admin accounts is that they are linked to our regular account. That lets us do things like editing message for formating or to insert Off Topic notices without loging out and back in. In this case she had not seen the suspension notice and responded. The software simply used the Admin account. No harm, no foul.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 100 by deerbreh, posted 07-06-2006 2:12 PM | | deerbreh has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 104 by deerbreh, posted 07-06-2006 2:26 PM | | AdminJar has not replied |
|
AdminJar
Inactive Member
|
|
|
Message 129 of 304 (330659)
07-10-2006 10:56 PM
|
|
|
Not a debate thread
If you want to discuss it, write a PNT.
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 131 by deerbreh, posted 07-10-2006 11:46 PM | | AdminJar has not replied |
|
AdminJar
Inactive Member
|
|
|
Message 139 of 304 (331515)
07-13-2006 1:38 PM
|
Reply to: Message 138 by Jazzns
07-13-2006 1:17 PM
|
|
Re: Temp closing of Logic thread
I'll open it back up, but let's head back towards the topic please.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 138 by Jazzns, posted 07-13-2006 1:17 PM | | Jazzns has not replied |
|
AdminJar
Inactive Member
|
|
|
Message 179 of 304 (334444)
07-23-2006 12:16 AM
|
Reply to: Message 178 by Faith
07-22-2006 11:58 PM
|
|
You and omni were headed off into defining belief systems, whether your belief system were subjective, whether you base your position on some personal belief. None of that has anything to do that I can see with the subject. Gay Marriage only comes ito the issue in relation to the validity of a marriage sanctioned by some other GOD. It is not about whether you consider Gay Marriage moral or otherwise, but only how you justify the difference in legitimacy between the two.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 178 by Faith, posted 07-22-2006 11:58 PM | | Faith has not replied |
|
AdminJar
Inactive Member
|
|
|
Message 185 of 304 (334879)
07-24-2006 1:53 PM
|
Reply to: Message 183 by kalimero
07-24-2006 1:50 PM
|
|
Showcase is by invitation only.
You can post a request to participate in this thread
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 183 by kalimero, posted 07-24-2006 1:50 PM | | kalimero has not replied |
|
AdminJar
Inactive Member
|
Re: Apologies to Oblivionlord
Posting privileges restored.
|
AdminJar
Inactive Member
|
Your posting privileges have been restored.
Please try to stay on topic and follow Admin sugestions.
|
AdminJar
Inactive Member
|
|
|
Message 242 of 304 (341921)
08-21-2006 12:07 PM
|
Reply to: Message 241 by Brian
08-21-2006 10:40 AM
|
|
Sure if the behavior is bad enough.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 241 by Brian, posted 08-21-2006 10:40 AM | | Brian has not replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 243 by Trump won, posted 08-23-2006 1:01 AM | | AdminJar has not replied |
|
AdminJar
Inactive Member
|
|
|
Message 249 of 304 (342810)
08-23-2006 4:42 PM
|
Reply to: Message 248 by CK
08-23-2006 4:40 PM
|
|
Re: Links and information?
Only if you rise to take the bait.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 248 by CK, posted 08-23-2006 4:40 PM | | CK has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 250 by CK, posted 08-23-2006 4:48 PM | | AdminJar has replied |
|
AdminJar
Inactive Member
|
|
|
Message 251 of 304 (342816)
08-23-2006 4:53 PM
|
Reply to: Message 250 by CK
08-23-2006 4:48 PM
|
|
Re: Links and information?
That does not mean you should go to links and information and chum the waters.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 250 by CK, posted 08-23-2006 4:48 PM | | CK has not replied |
|
AdminJar
Inactive Member
|
Re: Why Isn't "Inconvenient Truth" Closed?
Well, it is you. Remember? You're an admin? And you weren't involved in the discussion, as far as I remember. I'm not baiting you to ban me, I'm just curious what stayed your hand. He was not an Admin at the time.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 273 by crashfrog, posted 09-18-2006 4:48 PM | | crashfrog has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 276 by crashfrog, posted 09-18-2006 4:58 PM | | AdminJar has not replied |
|
™ Version 4.2
