Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,905 Year: 4,162/9,624 Month: 1,033/974 Week: 360/286 Day: 3/13 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Hydrologic Evidence for an Old Earth
SuperNintendo Chalmers
Member (Idle past 5863 days)
Posts: 772
From: Bartlett, IL, USA
Joined: 12-27-2005


Message 22 of 174 (326239)
06-25-2006 11:47 PM
Reply to: Message 19 by arachnophilia
06-25-2006 11:36 PM


give me a break
Come on; there have been a ton of stupid flood threads on this board and no one has ever presented one reasonable pro-flood argument ever. It's just stupid pseudo-scientific garbage over and over.
Seriously, I think the benefit of the doubt is over for this topic.
http://EvC Forum: Deposition and Erosion of Sediments -->EvC Forum: Deposition and Erosion of Sediments
http://EvC Forum: What Strata does the Biblical Flood Begin & End? -->EvC Forum: What Strata does the Biblical Flood Begin & End?
http://EvC Forum: Catastrophic Plate Tectonics - Fact or Fiction? -->EvC Forum: Catastrophic Plate Tectonics - Fact or Fiction?
http://EvC Forum: Where did the flood waters come from and where did they go? -->EvC Forum: Where did the flood waters come from and where did they go?
http://EvC Forum: Global Flood Evidence: A Place For Faith to Present Some -->EvC Forum: Global Flood Evidence: A Place For Faith to Present Some
http://EvC Forum: Long build up of Sediments -->EvC Forum: Long build up of Sediments
I think if there were any non-ridiculous pro-flood arguments they would have been presented by now...
.
Sorry... The world wide flood is my personal pet peeve topic

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by arachnophilia, posted 06-25-2006 11:36 PM arachnophilia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 25 by arachnophilia, posted 06-25-2006 11:55 PM SuperNintendo Chalmers has not replied

  
SuperNintendo Chalmers
Member (Idle past 5863 days)
Posts: 772
From: Bartlett, IL, USA
Joined: 12-27-2005


Message 151 of 174 (326868)
06-27-2006 3:18 PM
Reply to: Message 56 by Faith
06-26-2006 12:01 PM


tritium
Tritium is H3...
(that should be a subscript, but I'm too lazy to look up how to do it).
Tritium is VERY different from iridium (considering it's three H atoms and H is the lightest element)
Edited by AdminModulous, : Just added the sub tag for the subcript. Hope that's OK.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 56 by Faith, posted 06-26-2006 12:01 PM Faith has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 159 by MangyTiger, posted 06-27-2006 8:00 PM SuperNintendo Chalmers has replied

  
SuperNintendo Chalmers
Member (Idle past 5863 days)
Posts: 772
From: Bartlett, IL, USA
Joined: 12-27-2005


Message 152 of 174 (326870)
06-27-2006 3:21 PM
Reply to: Message 72 by Faith
06-26-2006 1:58 PM


Re: Hydrological evidence of an old earth
Unless it occurred in a worldwide flood.
And remember, there ARE fossils in the layers, and at the rate of deposition required by the Old Earth model, there's no way any of them would have been able to fossilize.
Wby not? Would you care to back this up?
Oh wait... you can't because you don't have a clue what you are talking about

This message is a reply to:
 Message 72 by Faith, posted 06-26-2006 1:58 PM Faith has not replied

  
SuperNintendo Chalmers
Member (Idle past 5863 days)
Posts: 772
From: Bartlett, IL, USA
Joined: 12-27-2005


Message 153 of 174 (326871)
06-27-2006 3:23 PM
Reply to: Message 82 by CK
06-26-2006 8:08 PM


Re: Forum Guidelines Warning
has to be wrong if it does not match 100% with the bible
Actually it's even worse.... it's if it doesn't match with Faith's own personal interpretation of someone else's translation of the bible

This message is a reply to:
 Message 82 by CK, posted 06-26-2006 8:08 PM CK has not replied

  
SuperNintendo Chalmers
Member (Idle past 5863 days)
Posts: 772
From: Bartlett, IL, USA
Joined: 12-27-2005


Message 154 of 174 (326873)
06-27-2006 3:29 PM
Reply to: Message 99 by Faith
06-26-2006 9:35 PM


Re: Hydrological evidence of an old earth
Hey, that was a very commonsensical suggestion based on what I was told by evo practical jokers, that what needed explanation was why so many bird fossils are found with dinosaurs if position of burial had nothing to do with evolution but only with location of the animal at the time of the flood. It involved thoughts about animals seeking the highest possible ground. Nothing more commonsensical to my mind, given the circumstances posited, than that the dinosaurs themselves must have been the highest ground in their locale from the point of view of the birds.
OMG.... you can't be serious... did you graduate high school?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 99 by Faith, posted 06-26-2006 9:35 PM Faith has not replied

  
SuperNintendo Chalmers
Member (Idle past 5863 days)
Posts: 772
From: Bartlett, IL, USA
Joined: 12-27-2005


Message 156 of 174 (326878)
06-27-2006 3:39 PM
Reply to: Message 145 by Faith
06-27-2006 2:12 PM


Re: question
I find it very odd that a written testimony to a physical event is not regarded as scientific evidence.
Yes, just like all the evidence we have for medusae, cyclops, hydra, poseiden, zeus, etc.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 145 by Faith, posted 06-27-2006 2:12 PM Faith has not replied

  
SuperNintendo Chalmers
Member (Idle past 5863 days)
Posts: 772
From: Bartlett, IL, USA
Joined: 12-27-2005


Message 174 of 174 (326992)
06-27-2006 10:34 PM
Reply to: Message 159 by MangyTiger
06-27-2006 8:00 PM


Re: tritium
Thanks for the correction Mangy....
You are of course correct. I can't believe I forgot that. Amazing what 10 years removal will do to one's chemistry knowledge
I stand corrected and a bit ashamed
hehehe

This message is a reply to:
 Message 159 by MangyTiger, posted 06-27-2006 8:00 PM MangyTiger has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024