Come on; there have been a ton of stupid flood threads on this board and no one has ever presented one reasonable pro-flood argument ever. It's just stupid pseudo-scientific garbage over and over.
Seriously, I think the benefit of the doubt is over for this topic.
And remember, there ARE fossils in the layers, and at the rate of deposition required by the Old Earth model, there's no way any of them would have been able to fossilize.
Wby not? Would you care to back this up?
Oh wait... you can't because you don't have a clue what you are talking about
Hey, that was a very commonsensical suggestion based on what I was told by evo practical jokers, that what needed explanation was why so many bird fossils are found with dinosaurs if position of burial had nothing to do with evolution but only with location of the animal at the time of the flood. It involved thoughts about animals seeking the highest possible ground. Nothing more commonsensical to my mind, given the circumstances posited, than that the dinosaurs themselves must have been the highest ground in their locale from the point of view of the birds.
OMG.... you can't be serious... did you graduate high school?