I do not feel a need to circumise, or did Jesus.
Wasn't Jesus circumcized? I think he had to be at that time didn't he? He was a Jew and trying to be King of the Jews, so it would seem odd that he would not have been a recipient of that tradition.
The tradition of circumcision is most certainly in the Bible. From what little I know of scripture on circ, Paul speaks slightly for it and sometimes against it, but more against it because its boastful and prideful rather than overtly wrong. The Gospel of Thomas has Jesus deriding it as not useful. That would be neither prescribed nor proscribed activity.
Besides all that, I do not think sucking a babies bloody penis is a good idea at all, or do I know of any biblical references to it.
The sucking is with wine and meant to sterilize and anaesthetize the region. That was probably a good idea when they originally put it into practice (~100ad?) but obviously has a major flaw if the person sucking has a mouth full of disease.
That was not biblical, but practical. Merely the hacking apart of the genitals was biblical. And whether you think Jesus was right or not, if you do believe the Bible then God most certainly did command it. At least at some point God wanted foreskins. Maybe he sucked on them in heaven? I dunno.
holmes
"...what a fool believes he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.."(D. Bros)