Help me understand Intelligent Design

It seems that you are confused.I explicitly asked: You did not answer that. I guess I should conclude that you don't actually have a point. I have no idea what you are reading (or what you are smoking). I did not ask for more evidence.I pointed out that the reasons others are dismissing your arguments is because you do not provide evidence, but I never asked you to provide evidence.I will ask once again. Please provide a succint statement of what it is you are trying to establish.

Quite the contrary. I am looking for a simple clear one line explanation of what you are trying to argue. As best I can tell, that isn't anything you have yet provided.

Hmm, yes, I do remember that. My apologies.Still, it isn't obvious that your arguments have anything to do with this. It's a question of whether the original mutations are random, so the improbability of the result of accumulated mutations would not be relevant.Incidently, I personally disagree with "Mutation + Natural Selection = Evolution." IMO the driving force of evolution is biological reproduction.

That can happen in any public forum, if you try to defend a controversial position. And it can quickly become frustrating having to answer everyone at the same time.If you want to further pursue your point in the future, you might want to see if you can find someone to debate you on a Great Debate thread. That way you get to debate with just a single opponent.