Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Intelligent Design ⇒

Help me understand Intelligent Design

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Prev12
Author Topic:   Help me understand Intelligent Design
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9004
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003

Normal Thread Display
Message 272 of 303 (253330)
10-20-2005 10:53 AM 		Reply to: Message 266 by ausar_maat
10-20-2005 9:01 AM

pre specification again???
pp. 51-52:
​
From there on in your post the quotes are talking about probabilities based on an outcome specified in advance. Did you or did you not agree that this is erroneous when used to refer to evolution?
This message is a reply to:
 Message 266 by ausar_maat, posted 10-20-2005 9:01 AM ausar_maat has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 275 by ausar_maat, posted 10-20-2005 11:46 AM NosyNed has not replied
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9004
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003

Normal Thread Display
Message 288 of 303 (253397)
10-20-2005 1:29 PM 		Reply to: Message 286 by ausar_maat
10-20-2005 1:23 PM

randomness inferred?
there is no such thing. We infer randomness,
​
I think you are utterly wrong but then maybe I just haven't a clue what you are talking about.
​
I think I've reached a point where it is clear we are totally unable to communicate and it is just wasting time so you don't have to bother answering this.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 286 by ausar_maat, posted 10-20-2005 1:23 PM ausar_maat has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 291 by ausar_maat, posted 10-20-2005 2:10 PM NosyNed has replied
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 9004
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003

Normal Thread Display
Message 292 of 303 (253417)
10-20-2005 2:15 PM 		Reply to: Message 291 by ausar_maat
10-20-2005 2:10 PM

Resting
I have a couple of minutes that I can waste so I'll reply.
​
We are totally unable to communicate. There is no further need carrying on a discussion.
​
Since I have been complimented on my communication abilities when dealing with very complex subjects I'd suggest that there is at least a 5/50 chance that the problem mostly lies with you.
​
I don't really care what you think so carry on as you are.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 291 by ausar_maat, posted 10-20-2005 2:10 PM ausar_maat has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 293 by ausar_maat, posted 10-20-2005 2:19 PM NosyNed has not replied
 Message 294 by Chiroptera, posted 10-20-2005 2:27 PM NosyNed has not replied
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Prev12
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024