Plasma cosmology

Plasma cosmology, big bang and shrinking sun .... stop hoping for theoretical concensus amongst acientists on mega scale time-space phenomena. Science needs only ONE tested and validated observation to reject any hypothesis or even "established" theory. Besides, more measurable than cosmic scale changes in universe are empirical observations of events in real time. Does global warming not provide sufficient evidence foor a changing rather than constant universe ?This message has been edited by AndyA, 10-04-2005 01:15 AMThis message has been edited by AndyA, 10-04-2005 02:23 AM

---

AndyA

Sure, but what's your point ? In principle there is no difference between micro and macro scale phenomena. A grain of sand is an excellent model for a solar system: the same scientific principles apply to both. Why would a larger physical Universe behave to different laws. If you are referring to an unquantifiable metaphysical universe, then there is no point in scientific discussion. The only discussion you can have is with a fellow traveller, or a science fiction writer.

---

AndyA

1. Under an electron microscope, an atom would appear like a solar system. A grain of sand would strongly resemble a galaxy. There would be clusters of nuclei around which revolve electrons, with large spaces in between.2. With respect to global warming, you have fallen into the concensus science trap. There is evidence to show that our planet has indeed warmed over the past 100 years, but that the cause is anthropogenic CO2, is far from certain. Increased solar activity + cosmic rays reaching our atmosphere account for something like 95% of global warming. The greenhouse proponents constitute a lucrative political “concensus” viewpoint that many atmospheric scientists reject . For starters you might look at Still Waiting For Greenhouse and search for papers particularly by Landscheidt, and Svensmark and Baliunas.

---

AndyA