Author
|
Topic: Plasma cosmology
|
christ_fanatic
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 1 of 31 (243964)
09-15-2005 10:06 PM
|
|
|
I recently learned of an interesting cosmology, supported by Hannes Alfven called plasma universe. When researching it, however, I could find very little info about it. Can anyone explain this to me?
Replies to this message: | | Message 2 by AdminBen, posted 09-15-2005 10:27 PM | | christ_fanatic has replied | | Message 7 by cavediver, posted 09-17-2005 8:40 AM | | christ_fanatic has replied |
|
christ_fanatic
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 3 of 31 (244065)
09-16-2005 6:30 AM
|
Reply to: Message 2 by AdminBen 09-15-2005 10:27 PM
|
|
Re: Welcome!
Okay. Basically what I learned was that plasma cosmology is dependent upon the em and nuclear forces being dominant over gravity in the universe on a grand scale. With that, I learned that plasma cosmology is extrapolating the current data to say that we are in a subset a large (maybe infinite) universe with subsets (like the known universe) that are expanding and contracting. As I said, I learned very little. What I do know comes from Unverse by Design by Danny Faulkner.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 2 by AdminBen, posted 09-15-2005 10:27 PM | | AdminBen has replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 4 by AdminBen, posted 09-16-2005 9:45 PM | | christ_fanatic has not replied | | Message 6 by nwr, posted 09-16-2005 10:51 PM | | christ_fanatic has not replied |
|
christ_fanatic
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 8 of 31 (244404)
09-17-2005 1:42 PM
|
Reply to: Message 7 by cavediver 09-17-2005 8:40 AM
|
|
Thanks.
Thanks for this info. Right now, I think a version of a white-hole cosmology will eventually replace BB.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 7 by cavediver, posted 09-17-2005 8:40 AM | | cavediver has replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 9 by cavediver, posted 09-17-2005 2:09 PM | | christ_fanatic has replied |
|
christ_fanatic
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 10 of 31 (244431)
09-17-2005 4:28 PM
|
Reply to: Message 9 by cavediver 09-17-2005 2:09 PM
|
|
Re: Thanks.
The WH cosmology can explain evidence the BB has yet to. Does it have difficulties? Yes. But this mainly due to its infancy in age and a short amount time for refining it. Don't forget, the BB was like this for more than 20 yrs until the CBR (CMB) was discovered. This message has been edited by christ_fanatic, 09-17-2005 04:29 PM
This message is a reply to: | | Message 9 by cavediver, posted 09-17-2005 2:09 PM | | cavediver has replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 11 by cavediver, posted 09-18-2005 7:36 AM | | christ_fanatic has replied |
|
christ_fanatic
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 12 of 31 (244575)
09-18-2005 9:45 AM
|
Reply to: Message 11 by cavediver 09-18-2005 7:36 AM
|
|
Re: Thanks.
His was a good starting point, and what about the article about a WH cosmology in SA (?)?
This message is a reply to: | | Message 11 by cavediver, posted 09-18-2005 7:36 AM | | cavediver has replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 13 by cavediver, posted 09-18-2005 10:09 AM | | christ_fanatic has replied | | Message 14 by Phat, posted 09-18-2005 10:19 AM | | christ_fanatic has replied |
|
christ_fanatic
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 15 of 31 (244630)
09-18-2005 12:58 PM
|
Reply to: Message 13 by cavediver 09-18-2005 10:09 AM
|
|
Re: Thanks.
I found a reff for it in an article I read about it in. It is apparently not online. Its from Proccedings of the National Academy of Sciences published Sept 2003.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 13 by cavediver, posted 09-18-2005 10:09 AM | | cavediver has not replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 17 by Matt P, posted 09-19-2005 6:04 PM | | christ_fanatic has replied |
|
christ_fanatic
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 16 of 31 (244632)
09-18-2005 1:03 PM
|
Reply to: Message 14 by Phat 09-18-2005 10:19 AM
|
|
Re: Thanks.
I was at the book signing of the book. I don't care as to where this thread is put. I'll see you in the coffee house.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 14 by Phat, posted 09-18-2005 10:19 AM | | Phat has not replied |
|
christ_fanatic
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 18 of 31 (245112)
09-20-2005 7:57 AM
|
Reply to: Message 17 by Matt P 09-19-2005 6:04 PM
|
|
Re: PNAS info
Thanks for finding it.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 17 by Matt P, posted 09-19-2005 6:04 PM | | Matt P has not replied |
|