Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
7 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Should intellectually honest fundamentalists live like the Amish?
deerbreh
Member (Idle past 2922 days)
Posts: 882
Joined: 06-22-2005


Message 285 of 303 (237256)
08-26-2005 10:40 AM
Reply to: Message 283 by Faith
08-26-2005 10:23 AM


Re: Never was any intellectual dishonesty
Faith writes:
"Hutton" stands for geologists
This is a very telling statement and is another illustration of the philosophical box you are in, Faith. Hutton was born, lived, worked, and died in the 18th century. His understanding is no more representative of modern geology than Pasteur's understanding is of modern medicine or Newton's is of modern physics. Can you imagine if doctors had to practice medicine with only what Pasteur knew? Come on, Faith, you know better than that. Hutton was right about some things just as Pasteur and Newton were right about some things but geology, medicine and physics are light years beyond those three fine scientists.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 283 by Faith, posted 08-26-2005 10:23 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 286 by Faith, posted 08-26-2005 10:52 AM deerbreh has replied

deerbreh
Member (Idle past 2922 days)
Posts: 882
Joined: 06-22-2005


Message 287 of 303 (237264)
08-26-2005 11:13 AM
Reply to: Message 286 by Faith
08-26-2005 10:52 AM


Re: Never was any intellectual dishonesty
Faith writes:
What is the matter with you? I used the name "Hutton" knowing full well who he is and when he lived and obviously used it as a symbol.
But that was my point, Faith. The fact that you would knowingly use an 18th century geologist as a symbol for modern geology is quite telling of your understanding of geology. It is even worse than thinking that Darwin said everything there is to say about evolution.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 286 by Faith, posted 08-26-2005 10:52 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 291 by Faith, posted 08-26-2005 11:39 AM deerbreh has not replied

deerbreh
Member (Idle past 2922 days)
Posts: 882
Joined: 06-22-2005


Message 289 of 303 (237271)
08-26-2005 11:29 AM
Reply to: Message 279 by Silent H
08-26-2005 4:53 AM


Re: How long can faith be allowed to lie?
faith writes:
I will I hope go on to apply this reasoning to the pictures you posted of unconformities. Hutton decided they must have taken a long time to form. I'm not so sure and he can't prove it and neither will I be able to prove whatever interpretation God allows me to come up with.
Holmes writes:
This appears to be a patent lie. I gave you links to the history and principles used in determining relative age which are used in situations like unconformities.
Come on, Holmes, you have to quit this. Lying is willful misrepresentation of what one believes to be true. Faith does not believe unconformities took a long time to form so it can't be a lie. Furthermore Hutton could NOT prove deep time for the unconformities. It was the 18th century after all. We can prove it today and that is one of my contentions with Faith about modern geology versus 18th century geology.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 279 by Silent H, posted 08-26-2005 4:53 AM Silent H has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 292 by Silent H, posted 08-26-2005 11:47 AM deerbreh has not replied

deerbreh
Member (Idle past 2922 days)
Posts: 882
Joined: 06-22-2005


Message 294 of 303 (237291)
08-26-2005 12:01 PM
Reply to: Message 290 by Faith
08-26-2005 11:34 AM


Re: Never was any intellectual dishonesty
Faith writes:
I guess we aren't going to get to the unconformities on this thread as it is nearing its end and you want to have this side conversation about my supposed iniquities.
Well Faith you may consider it a side conversation. The title of the thread is a little open ended so it is hard to say but I have been pressing you on the "intellectual honesty" part. We all have our discomfort zones. The fact that you would react as violently as you did in post 291 suggests to me that I am getting pretty close to your discomfort zone. If you don't want to be pressed this way I would say you shouldn't post on these threads because someone is going to press you even if it isn't me. Just believe what you have to believe and let it go at that. I for one will leave you alone because the last thing I want to do is upset anyone about their faith. Some people have to believe in YEC to make their faith work. I don't but that is me and that doesn't make my faith better or worse than yours, just different.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 290 by Faith, posted 08-26-2005 11:34 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 295 by Faith, posted 08-26-2005 12:07 PM deerbreh has not replied
 Message 296 by Faith, posted 08-26-2005 12:18 PM deerbreh has replied

deerbreh
Member (Idle past 2922 days)
Posts: 882
Joined: 06-22-2005


Message 298 of 303 (237314)
08-26-2005 12:51 PM
Reply to: Message 296 by Faith
08-26-2005 12:18 PM


Re: Never was any intellectual dishonesty
deer writes:
I for one will leave you alone because the last thing I want to do is upset anyone about their faith. Some people have to believe in YEC to make their faith work. I don't but that is me and that doesn't make my faith better or worse than yours, just different.
Faith writes:
What a smug self-satisfied piece of BS. Speak for yourself and leave your theories about why I believe what I believe out of it.
Ok fair enough. But consider this. What did I say that you have not said yourself? You have to believe in YEC to make your faith work. Is that not a true statement? The fact that I am saying that I don't need YEC makes me smug about my faith? No. I just don't need YEC. There are plenty of things about my faith that I am not sure of, that I need to "work" on. In fact I rather admire someone who can attest to little doubt about their faith. Jesus said that "Blessed are those who have not seen and yet believe. (John 20:29) I am a doubting Thomas, no doubt about it. But yet I believe.
This message has been edited by deerbreh, 08-26-2005 12:53 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 296 by Faith, posted 08-26-2005 12:18 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 299 by Faith, posted 08-26-2005 12:58 PM deerbreh has not replied
 Message 300 by Faith, posted 08-26-2005 1:02 PM deerbreh has replied

deerbreh
Member (Idle past 2922 days)
Posts: 882
Joined: 06-22-2005


Message 301 of 303 (237382)
08-26-2005 2:06 PM
Reply to: Message 300 by Faith
08-26-2005 1:02 PM


Re: Never was any intellectual dishonesty
Not believing that God authored the Bible leaves you open to every kind of doubt and whim of doctrine.
Oh I believe God authored the Bible. I just don't believe he dictated it. And don't get me wrong. My faith is way stronger believing that the Bible is the story of God working with his people than it would be if I thought it WAS dictated. There are different ways of believing, Faith. You think I am too smug, I think you are too judgemental.
But I am way OT and this thread is over the limit.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 300 by Faith, posted 08-26-2005 1:02 PM Faith has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024