The flood, and meat eating.

Red shift has been demonstrated to be caused by objects moving away. The greater the red shift, the faster the object is moving.And no, the background radition can not be explained by a number of 'radition objects' That is because the background radation is consistant, not coming from any one source. Radation from specific objects would vary in intensity. (i.e... just like stars to). The 'background' radiation is amazingly even. This would be consistant with a big bang.The observation that caused people to conclude that the 'big bang' happened is that the objects in the universe are flying away from each other. As we took our observations, and extraploated back , the objects got closer and closer togather. BTW, The concept that is started as a single point came from a priest.. .. funny thing, huh?

Really?? They were?? I would have to say that when you look at Genesis, and the evidence for the big bang, it doens't match at all.But, I suppose you see what you want to.

Actually, Santa is quite correct. The ancient hebrews used a LUNAR calendar, which is still in use today! The current system was formalized
in the 4th century C.E. I would say that his statement about the ancient hebrews knowing their year is right. The stuff about Moeses is
pure speculation.That is why that the Jewish Sabbath started at sundown, because it is a lunar calender.http://www.lexicorient.com/e.o/jew_cal.htmThis message has been edited by ramoss, 09-17-2005 08:34 AM