|
Author
|
Topic: What is the YEC answer to the lack of shorter lived isotopes?
|
d_yankee
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 90 of 128 (221026)
06-30-2005 11:02 PM
|
Reply to: Message 10 by agrav8r
01-08-2004 7:18 PM
|
|
Not even...
I wouldn't even call it scientism...as it isn't science at all. The use of science is for marketing purposes. True science is a neutral study using the laws of nature, not dogmatic and ficticious fairy tale.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 10 by agrav8r, posted 01-08-2004 7:18 PM | | agrav8r has not replied |
|
d_yankee
Inactive Member
|
|
|
Message 91 of 128 (221027)
06-30-2005 11:05 PM
|
Reply to: Message 88 by NosyNed
07-03-2004 12:05 AM
|
|
Re: bump bump
That's because as you can see...those on the debate of the billions year old fairy tale are refusing to see things from a neutral and open perspective. One can not argue or debate with one who is in denial of facts and not intended to be open minded. If so, then I would love to oblige.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 88 by NosyNed, posted 07-03-2004 12:05 AM | | NosyNed has not replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 92 by roxrkool, posted 07-01-2005 12:00 AM | | d_yankee has replied |
|
d_yankee
Inactive Member
|
|
|
Message 93 of 128 (221041)
07-01-2005 12:06 AM
|
Reply to: Message 92 by roxrkool
07-01-2005 12:00 AM
|
|
Re: bump bump
Huh???
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 92 by roxrkool, posted 07-01-2005 12:00 AM | | roxrkool has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 94 by roxrkool, posted 07-01-2005 4:20 PM | | d_yankee has not replied |
|
™ Version 4.2