jar writes:
But that is the nature, strength and value of science. Theories are our best explaination of how something happened. As we learn more, as we gather more data, as new evidence is discovered, the theories must explain the new information. That means the theories MUST change if they are to remain our best explainations.
This is all true and I have no problem with it. My problem with the big bang is that it is supposed to explain the origins of the universe. If the whole theory of evolution is true, we went from very simple to very complex as everything in the universe and the universe itself. So, if we are going to go backward things should get simpler along the way. In the big bang theory the same shold be expected but it appears to me that the theory makes the past get more complicated the farther we go back in time. There appears to be some sort of logical error involved. Can anybody clear this up for me.
Ponlo todo en las manos de Dios y que se joda el mundo. El principio de la sabiduria es el temor a Jehova
™ Version 4.2
