Creationist Admins

Erm - no Paul - his behaviour has been okay.His suggestion might be wrong, but he IS posting according to guidelines. Please do not try and suggest bootcamp for someone if they disagree with you.I for one, recall many assertions by you, that went without complaint - about me being a liar and hypocrit etc..and you purposefully twist things around a lot. You're not a good example of evo-harmony.Nor is Hambre - he's an admin, and he's a right militant. If I mention "God" in a thread - despite someone else bringing up the issue - he complains about me rather than the person who brought it up.

Ned, I don't think you mis-use your admin status. I just thought his overall postage content wasn't that bad, is all.(I was unaware he was abusing his satus - by assuming another identity. Obviously I will no longer defend him)....I seem to have a nack of picking the wrong chickens to pluck. This message has been edited by mike the wiz, 11-15-2004 10:49 AM

My immediate impression was that he was being provocative within the rules, maybe I didn't read into his assertions enough. But please - don't take what I said as Gospel, it was just an opinion of Paul's post really. I have been proven wrong anyway - as he has now actively gone against forum rules.The only recommendation for anyone here - I would make, is to not be too "Sensitive" to comments, as,--> if people are blowing hot air - it will be revealed. As for the admin regularly persecuting none-evos - I personally thought that was just trash, so I didn't address it.I mean - I was super-creo for an age here - and the admin never persecuted me.

Jar and Ned - please don't read too much into my post to Paul, it really wasn't intended as an admin attack - please don't misconstrue it as aimed at the admins. It isn't - it was aimed at Paul at the time.

I know it's tough for the admins. Being Ken's mod the other day gave me a taste, he emailed me every half-hour, Lol. (And didn't I tell him to stop provoking you?).Anyway - the point I make about Hambre is that he seems to want to moderate mike - when mike isn't particularly doing anything wrong - and when it suits him to refute me - then he'll do that instead.

DO you mean, in that - he makes a comment to me, like I made comment to you, rather than the person on the other side of the spectrum? Fair enough.And so this is fair. I am glad we can reason. Yes - I will give Hambre the benefit of the doubt, and end my tongues against him.